james_ogara1 Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 Netters, I was comparing some E100-S slides with their more recentE100-G brethren, and noticed that the latter seemed noticeably moreneutral. Does anyone have any experience with this, or with whetherE100-GX is a closer match? I'm heading to the Middle East and amabout to stock up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnabdas Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 The E100GX is warmer and slightly more saturated compared to E100G. This may e similar to E100S but I have not shot much E100S so I cannot comment. E100GX is definitely less saturated (and less grainy) compared to E100VS (of which I've shot lots). The E100G is "Provia sans the blue cast" if you know what I mean. So sad that Kodak should come out with this magnificant pair of emulsions at the end of film's hayday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 To look at the curves on the Kodak data sheets, E100G is a trifle cooler than E100S. The three curves (R, G, & B) track very parallel, but the blue curve is the tiniest bit brighter. (Probably a very slight yellow CC filter, or a very weak warming filter, could get you dead neutral.) By comparison, the E100S curves are very close to each other, and diverge to warm in the deepest shadows. E100GX looks to be very similar to E100SW in color curves. But the warm shadows affect closer to mid-tones on both films than E100S. I find that E100GX is much better behaved outside than E100G, the "Ektachrome blues" are tamed by the warm shadows. E100G has really been balanced for studio strobe lighting, where you don't have the "shadows lit by blue sky" problem. You will note that Elite Chrome 100 is balanced similar to E100GX, not E100G. Ektachrome Professional 100 (EPN) might be the closest to E100S by looking at the curves. But it's pricey, and it's a generation older, so more grain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_ogara1 Posted January 17, 2005 Author Share Posted January 17, 2005 John, thanks for that analysis. I've never used a warm tone film -- most of what I shoot is outside, and I'm afraid of distorting the already warm skin tones of the Egyptians who are my favorite subjects. Also, GX is $1.50 more a roll and I have to buy 100 rolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_tuthill Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 <A HREF="http://www.photographical.net/kodak_e100g.html">Here is</A> a comparison of E100S, E100G, and Provia 100F. It was done mid 2003 and is still there! I believe that E100G was designed mostly as a competitor for 100F, not as a direct replacement of E100S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmc Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 I've onlu tried GX - having used SW before - and I find them to be fairly similar. Having said that, though, I would be surprised if Kodak didn't change the tones a bit... Best, Joerg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fast_primes Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 If I were headed for an equatorial country, I'd expect extremes of lighting from full noon Sun to the dusk dimness of a covered souk or monument in seconds. Consequently, I'd suggest negative film with equal portions of Reala, NPH and NPZ. If you still want slides and you're shooting 35mm, send to Dales Labs and ask for their slides from negatives plus CD Rom scans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_ogara1 Posted January 19, 2005 Author Share Posted January 19, 2005 One thing I learned a long time ago is there's no fighting the sun in the Middle East -- it always wins. Best time to take pictures is right at dawn, and for acouple hours after, then duck into cafes during the day, and back outside for the golden hour or two before sunset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now