ellis_vener_photography Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/12/afternoons-with-worsom/<P> <I>"Three days a week our high school?s photography class forgoes its lunchperiod in favor of extended field trips throughout Chicago. The main purpose ofthe class is for the students to use photography as a medium to recognize andportray the beauty in themselves and in their fellow students.<P> Another objective is to explore the many diverse communities and institutions ofChicago. A typical week might take us from a local college to a museum to aforest preserve to an ethnic neighborhood. We will go anywhere as long as thedestination is free. However, the students? favorite journey is our afternoonvisits to Worsom?s studio, located just a few blocks from our school.<P> Everyone on the Westside of Chicago knows Worsom. As the sole photographer forthe Chicago Defender, one of the oldest African-American newspapers in thecountry, his camera is omnipresent at any community, political or sporting eventof importance. He is a talented and respected portrait photographer, and hispictures hang proudly in a dizzying number of Chicago homes. Worsom truly is amodern day ?Picture Man.?</I><P> Those are the first three paragraphs and it gets better from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill_clark___minnetonka_mi Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Thanks Ellis. Aren't we lucky to be where we are, living like we are, coming from where we were raised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 ...and we're lucky to have the New York Times. Thanks Ellis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee_ricks Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 I knew there was something I needed to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_swinehart Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 "...and we're lucky to have the New York Times." Some people are just natural comedians.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtk Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 Another excellent NYT article was in this Sunday's Books section, a brilliantly written review of Life of Picasso (one of several in a series on his life...goes up to 1930)... Picasso was vastly more important to the sweep of photography itself than any "art photographer"... people like Brassai and David Douglas Duncan noticed, but "photo historians" are blind in this area and, as terrible writers, they are also blind to the importance of literature to photography. Crucially important writers such as Norman Mailer, Malraux (who I mentioned earlier) and Rilke were drawn to him...painters and writers have always been far better educated than photographers IMO, as we tend to be technical types more than visual. Flip the next page to a review of essays by Judith Thurman you'll find intensely interesting discussion related to Avedon ("...what's moving about fashion: It dies young.") and to Diane Arbus and Leni Riefenstahl (Thurman easily makes it obvious why Riefenstahl would embrace fascism and Hitler). Might buy that book. It'd be great if the NYT had competition in cultural areas, including photography. The only similarly serious newspaper I know of is the LA Times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyanatic Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 Thanks for pointing us to the article, Ellis. A simple breath of fresh air, and a nice counterpoint to all of the "death of photography", digital/film, old/new, moral/amoral, navel gazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJHingel Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 "Aren't we lucky to be where we are, living like we are, coming from where we were raised?" Bill, it is interesting that most of us can sign that message wherever we come from and whether we are daily readers of the New York Times, Le Monde, El Pais or Frankfurter Allgemeine. Thanks for informing us. Interesting article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twmeyer Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 actually, "most of us" isn't a very clear identifier. If "most of us" means the human race, then "most of us" wouldn't even be on the internet.<p>But if "most of us" means people at photo.net, then yep, we've all got it pretty sweet (comparatively)... t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJHingel Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Tom, to "sign" it means being on PN, "must of us" means us ! I agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
see_r Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 What are the New York Timmes? Anything like the New York Jeffes or New York Mikees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now