Jump to content

Vivitar 283 vs 285


Recommended Posts

I am trying to decide on a new flash to get and I can't decide between the two

(I use OM-1 and OM-1 cameras). I know that the 285 has the zoom head which

could be nice. Do both flashes have manual control? Or only the 285? Do all

285s have manual control, or just the newer ones. Will both work directly off

the hotshoe on an OM-1/OM-1n? Or do I need the flash synch cable to make it

work?

 

Any other information anyone might have that would be useful deciding between

the two would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you won't find a new 283, it's been discontinued for a couple of decades I'm sure. :)

 

For used, get a 285 or 285 HV, do not buy a new 285HV, the quality sucks. Rumor has it Vivitar pulled it off the market it is so bad.

 

All 285s have manual control, and there is a replacement sensor for the 283 that does full manual as well.

 

The 285 comes with an additional wide angle lens, covers at least a 28mm, maybe even a 24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both. The 283 comes with fewer options standard--such as manual partial power control and the zoom head. You have to buy accessories for it. Also, if you buy the 285 used, it may or may not come with the wide angle lens. My 285HV also underexposes quite a bit (not a big problem), and the auto apertures are a little different than with the 283. As I recall, you don't get to use f2.8 with ISO 400 with the 283. What are you going to use the flash for?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<i>Do both flashes have manual control? Or only the 285?</i><br>Both, but for variable manual output on the 283 you need the accessory VP-1 adapter. <p>

 

<i>Do all 285s have manual control, or just the newer ones.</i><br>All. Older 285 units may not have the "HV" option and (depending on age) may have a trigger voltage great enough to fry a new camera, but this should not be an issue for your venerable Olympus cameras.<p>

 

<i>Will both work directly off the hotshoe on an OM-1/OM-1n? Or do I need the flash synch cable to make it work?</i><br>Both will.<p><a href="mailto:henryp@bhphotovideo.com">Henry Posner</a><br>

<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com"><b>B&H Photo-Video</b></a>

Henry Posner

B&H Photo-Video

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone.

 

I'd love to use it for an upcoming wedding I am shooting. My brother is getting remarried at a fairly small ceremony and I am doing the photography for him. However, I don't think I am going to have enough time to get one and play with it. He isn't really going to have a wedding party and the group shots are going to be small (no more then 6 or 7 people in them). I should have available light photography covered. Otherwise I will be using my Sunpak DC3 (GN30).

 

That being said I'll probably use a 283 or 285 for night/indoor photography where I need finer control and much more power then my little Sunpak DC3 can manage. I have an eventual goal of being a 2nd shooter for weddings, but that might never happen or be a long way off and I have no intention of ever really being a primary shooter. Well, except at my brother's wedding or direct request, I just don't have the free time to run a photography business and I happen to love the job I have right now.

 

For low light photography I use a Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 and a Sigma 28mm f/1.8, so having something that can manage 28mm coverage would be nice so I don't need to switch to my 35-70/3.5 when I want to do a flash photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan--yeah, most flashes' guide numbers are optimistic. They are all tested in optimum conditions, like small white rooms or something. I meant that when you use an auto aperture with the 285, you get more underexposure than the 283. For shooting digital, this isn't such a bad thing, but for film, not so good. You can, of course, compensate. For film, I was sometimes compensating a stop and a half with the 285.

 

Matthew--I would say the 285HV is your best bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll vote for the 285HV too, although I've never used the HV part. I liked the flash so much that I bought another one and put an optical slave on it. Then another, and another, ... I have six of them now and have fired five of them at once on occasion. I've paid between $45 and $60 for them, all suitably scuffed up by someone else. (I hate to be the one to put the first dent in a brand-new tool.) At least these days the ones you get used on eBay will be the old tank-like model.

 

Van

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have both the 283 and the 285HV and the 285 is definitely the better unit because of the built in variable manual control and zoom head. Both are rock solid, though I haven't tried the recent production run of the reintroduced 285 -- mine are all from five to 25 years old. Do not try to shoot your brother's wedding without flash. Flash is standard for wedding photography. Without it your going to have shadows and poor lighting even where you have enough light (enough light and good light are not the same), out of focus shots from trying to shoot available light with two wide a lens opening to cover focusing mistakes, all other sorts of headaches and ultimately some places where you just can't get a shot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know this is a new question, but I have a feeling I'm not the only one reading this thread who will have it: can anyone tell me what te 'HV' stands for, or what the 'HV option' is on the 285? thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...