Revision of Critique Categories

<p>In August 2010 there had been enthusiastic discussion on revising the Image Categories:<br>

<a href="../casual-conversations-forum/00WzL8">http://www.photo.net/casual-conversations-forum/00WzL8</a></p>

<p>In October 2010 I had enquired about it:<br>

<a href="../site-help-forum/00XSuy">http://www.photo.net/site-help-forum/00XSuy</a></p>

<p><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=20462">Josh Root</a> <a href="../member-status-icons"><img title="Admin" src="../v3graphics/member-status-icons/admin.gif" alt="" /><img title="Subscriber" src="../v3graphics/member-status-icons/sub10plus.gif" alt="" /><img title="Frequent poster" src="../v3graphics/member-status-icons/3rolls.gif" alt="" /></a>, Oct 16, 2010; 09:34 a.m.</p>

<p>It's one of those things that I'm still working on. It was part of a larger project and can't be completed until that larger project is completed.<br>

So, short answer, nothing has happened. But I haven't forgotten about it either.<br>

---<br>

Just wondering if its still under consideration...</p>

<p>Yes. It is still something I very much want to do. However, in all honesty its a rather long and complicated project. Thus it keeps getting pushed down the list.</p>

<p>I hope that is something I can change.</p>

<p>Josh, I'm sure that Rajat and I are not the only subscribers who have experienced quandaries about where to post a particular image for critique. In my case, there have been several images involving urban settings that really aren't street shots. Then again, they don't involve landscapes <em>per se</em>. Finally, they don't really address architectural considerations. What I usually do in such situations is just to pick a category arbitrarily.</p>

<p>Many thanks . . .</p>