I just had a look at this month's Digital Journalist, and there was an article "25 under 25" of promising young photographic talent. A photograph (with accompaning blurb underneath) was shown for each of them. I didn't understand a single image!!! What is wrong? Am I such an antique that I've lost the ability to interpret photographs as they are being made today, or are the current crop of photographers unable to present images which stand on their own, rather than just illustrate some mundane facet peculiar to the subject? Grump, grump, grump.