Jump to content

No more Sigma lenses


Jochen_S

Recommended Posts

As I read the link, it only applies to K-mount, not to other mounts or systems.

 

It seems kind of strange to me that this comes out on Czech site? I see nothing at Sigma USA

 

All the same, it's too bad. I'm sure that, as the years pass, we'll see more of this for systems whose base is dwindling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

@ruslan: I dare to disagree. If people buy Pentax + Sigmas kits: Fine; another Pentax body sold might keep Pentax alive. If people don't like what they'll get out: Fine; another used Pentax body getting into our reach, some day or somebody gets nudged to pre-own a limited lens for a while.

 

Diversity never harms. Pentax might have benefitted from hitting the mass market with agressively priced (+ Sigma) kits.

Legendary Pentax glass? - Dunno isn't it made by Tamron these days and marked up a little? What to do if "legendary" stuff breaks, isn't fixable and out of production? - I like my 135/2.8...

 

You might be right about Sigma for Pentax quality, but still: I rather utilize my darn behemoth of an unspectacular 24/1.8, than pack up entirely. And the kit zoom substitutes do kit zoom jobs well enough, for me.

I don't want to touch the topic of lens gourmetism here. The K1D is an inexpensive body but if you add up & toss in a trinity of budget f2.8 zooms, it looks less competitively priced than on its own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@jochen I understand your idea, but Pentax

1) Has a long flange to sensor distance, so it uses lenses made for it only. It is not a Sony to which you can attach 200+ lenses.

2) Conservative. K-1 is like a 645Z smaller brother with that and the same ideology.

Pentax needs new limited lenses, and it needs some promotion... it is going to be the main player in DSLR field in 3 years from now.

Today I have examined the samples of/by Sony 85/1.8..... I say Sony CAN produce fine lenses. They are not shoddy, not cheap dirt, not flat rendering, no. Sony 85 is 20 years younger than 77 lim. Eye-focus. It renders better than Nikkor 85 and 58, just as well as 77 with modern touch. The 77 is but paler, duller colors, and I am ready to the fact that if I crank saturation, all color artifacts and noise will be more visible.... I dreamed of Pentax, but I might go Sony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...