Jump to content

ma or Q


Recommended Posts

I have 2 oldish leica film cameras, no digital. Am tempted by the Leica Q but also the Leica MA (film).

What would you choose? They cost about the same. I like the lens of the Q and the macro feature.

I have no use for the audio, video, or wi-fi and there's probably other twitchy/fiddly features of the Q I wouldn't like.

There's nothing to dislike about the MA if one likes film and has the lenses. Please let's not start a digital-film

argument again -- it's been done to death. I would like to hear from users of the Q.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go for the Q. It is the one digital Leica that I thought was absolutely wonderful (except for the price). I really don't think there is much to dislike about the Q other than it does not have interchangeable lenses and it will, of course, date. You also have to really like a 28mm lens, which I do.
Robin Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't own a Q (but I did have a dream about it). I have seen comparisons on DPReview between the Q and other full frame cameras. Apart from the M10, it is arguably the best camera with that sensor size. It's sharper than the RX1rII and on par or slightly better than the Nikon D800E etc. It's not cheap but you have to spend the same money to get the Nikon to perform as well as the Q, and all you get for your trouble is a huge camera that you aren't going to take with you on a day-to-day basis.

 

I think I'd prefer the M7 to the M-A, FWIW, on account of its electronically controlled shutter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did get excited about the Q and do like the 28mm focal length but don't like to spend that much on a fixed lens camera. Waiting for Leica to put their cards regarding a Q with M-mount on the table. That would make for the only Leica I could truly become interested in. Rangefinder - thanks, but no thanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Karim; I do have an m7 and use it all the time.

Apparently, the Q has a feature (software ? ) that changes, in camera, the viewpoint of the image to that of a 50mm focal length lens. I would think some pixels are lost or ignored in the process and I would assume the exact same thing could be accomplished in editing software with a judicial crop. Probably another useless feature?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Q has a feature (software ? ) that changes, in camera, the viewpoint of the image to that of a 50mm focal length lens.

 

It does have the option to select crops equivalent to 35mm and 50mm focal lengths field of views; the resulting image dimensions are

 

28mm 6000 x 4000 px

35mm 4800 x 3200 px

50mm 3360 x 2240 px

 

Rather than showing you a cropped image, the camera creates digital frame lines (like the M).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that budget, I don't think I'd choose either. If I wanted a new fixed focal length compact digital, the Q's 28mm lens would put me off. Instead, I'd go for the new Fuji X100F: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/fuji-x100f/fuji-x100fA.HTM which has a 35mm-equivalent lens and costs about a third of the price of the Leica. Then I'd look at the remaining budget and probably decide that rather than saving up for the M-A, I'd just buy one of the classic Leicas it's based on (an M3 for a quarter of the price, or an M4 for half the price), get it serviced by one of the top technicians to run like it just came out of the factory, and then contemplate how to spend the rest of the money...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...