jack_johnston Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 O.k. I've done some scanning in the archives, and it generally appears as if it's recommended that color print film be used for underwater use, and that slide film be firmly avoided. Even if that isn't necissarily correct, are there any recommendations for both color slide and print film for underwater use? The camera that will be taking the pictures is the Nikon Action Touch L35-AW. The subject matter will be the underwater springs in Florida, which are predominantly blue in color. Thanks for anyone who can help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_deratzian Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 First of all, I also preferred slide film for underwater, usually Velvia. Like anything else, slide vs. film v. digital is a matter of personal preference. I beleive the argument for print film is the exposure latitude, and that you are more likely to get a good print. I also liked Kodak Ektrachrome for a 100 speed film, before Velvia 100 (tried on land, not yet underwater.) I would suggest the most saturated film, and one with a little magenta cast to counter the blue of the water. Kodak has a process for underwater negative development and printing which is quite good, but is a send away process only. It relies on digital printing technology. There is also a PS action, if youare going to scan and digitally print yourself, which is very good, but I am not sure where I got it. It was free, so I assume that I could send it to you. Hope this is helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 I have used both but I prefered print so thatI could correct the color shift in the dark room. This was prescanner days so I see no problem using slide if you are using photoshop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans_beckert Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Underwater Ektachrome, made by you know who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canon_eos_rules Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 Hans, didn't Kodak discontinue Underwater Ektachrome a couple years ago? From what I know, Kodak doesn't make it anymore. My advice is to use a good color print film that has high color saturation and excellent blues. Dale Labs also offers "Kodak Sea Processing" for color print film that's optimized for underwater pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larrydressler Posted January 24, 2004 Share Posted January 24, 2004 What Hans no underwater Kodachrome 64 rated at 3200 developed in k-14 x32? : : }- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewdawsongallery Posted January 26, 2004 Share Posted January 26, 2004 "...generally appears as if it's recommended that color print film be used for underwater use, and that slide film be firmly avoided. " I don't know where you got that idea; people use slide film all the time. Your choice should be based on your own personal tastes and delivery requirements. I use Fujichrome for almost everything; Provia 100 for wide-angle, and Velvia for macro. Forget about Kodak's "underwater" film; they don't make it anymore, and it caused more problems than it solved anyway. Kodak's "Sea Processing" isn't much more than an advertising gimmick, IMHO. The concept isn't anything new, they're just doing color correction during printing to try to overcome any blue shift. ALL u/w photographs will have a blue cast unless fill flash is used properly. If you're using PS you can make the adjustments yourself. I don't wanna rain on your parade, but I think you'll find your biggest problem will be the camera and not your film choice. In general, P&S cameras don't perform that well underwater, for a number of reasons. I wrote an article for PN on the subject; if you're interested you can find it <a href="http://www.photo.net/learn/underwater/uw2/general.html" >here</a>. Cheers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack_johnston Posted January 26, 2004 Author Share Posted January 26, 2004 Thanks Andre. I largely got away from print film & I am mostly using slide these days. I thought about selecting some print film and I think I want to go ahead with the Kodak VC 400 or 160. 400 is probably what I will choose. Making this decision hasn't been easy & I might end up shooting some velvia instead. If I used 400 speed VC and the pictures look bad, then I am probably limited by my equipment and/or dive depth. If I can only get 10 feet down underwater, so be it. I will be sure to post my results on here when I get back which should be early April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now