Jump to content

Recommended Posts

<p>I have a Canonet QL19 which I bought in 2006. It was cosmetically perfect but also suffered from the stuck shutter. I had it repaired in 2006 at a cost of $100; a complete CLA. In 2010, it stopped working again, most likely a relapse of the sticky shutter syndrome. I am not sure I want to spend another $100 to fix it. The Canonets of this era are great cameras provided they are working. The lens is fabulous; the 45mm f1.9 is sharp and contrasty. But these older Canonets suffer from mechanical woes. By contrast, I also own a Canonet 28 which I purchased new as N.O.S in 1985. It has been CLA'd twice purely for maintenance purposes, not for repair. It has proven to be the most reliable camera I have ever owned. The 40mm f2.8 is supremely sharp as well. So much so that I think it is better than the Canon 40mm f1.7</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It's cheaper to replace than repair. The Canonet model you want is the GIII QL17. That was the final version, with a very sharp f/1.7 lens. I've used two and loved them. My current one has semi-stripped gears tha make film advance undependable. Tempted to pick up another one. These camera sometimes go for $100 or more. Got lucky and paid around $40 for mine, which I thinnk is much closer to the actual value.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>A number of Photo.net members have fixed stuck shutters/and or aperture blades by partially disassembling the lens and applying Ronsenol lighter fluid to the stuck blades. I got an Konica Auto S and a Minolta Hi-Matic 7S to work again by this method.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...