daniel_overbeek Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Does anybody have any idea how i can develop them? can I process them with DDX or Rodinal because those are the 2 i have right now. or should I buy another one? thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Check this chart and extrapolate the approximate time from the existing recommendations: http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 Recommend the Rodinal, since it's more prone to losing film speed, where DD-X tends to offer more speed, which you don't need in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzalo_echeverria Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 rodinal 1:100 constant inversions for the first minute, 3 inversion per minute for 3 minutes, then stand with no inversions for 16 minutes. or rodinal 1:100 constant agitation for the first minute, 3 inv every 3min for 18minutes you should get a neg with great shadows ( due to your ei32 ) with printable highlights. hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profhlynnjones Posted August 13, 2008 Share Posted August 13, 2008 Fuji Neopan 100 Acros Normal lighting contrast: ASA/ISO 100 Rodinal 1:50 Agitate vigorously for 15 seconds then 5 sec each 60 seconds 68F 8.5 min, 70F 8 min, 72F 7 min, 75F 6.5 min Zone 5 grey card net density, .70 GBar .50 I have additional info from 1:1 ratio to 32:1 ratio This is a terrific combo, however the tonal changes can be so subtle that the product can have an unusual look. I personally use TMX, D100, Acros 100, and New PX Pan. All the techniques are to the same international sensitometric standards but different films have different looks, or in some cases, are more fragile in accidental exposure or development error. Plus X and full strength D76 for example are extremely sharp and don't exhibit any grain for about 20x enlargement and will tolerate minor variations in exposure. D100 and Rodinal (either 1:25 or 1:50) loses about a 1/2 stop of speed and starts to show grain around 18X, but is very sharp and and tolerates my own occasional imperfections. TMX in Rodinal is incredibly sharp and fine grained but for me, tends to a bit pretty sensitive to user error (and few of us are perfect), however, when I'm looking for dynamite results I'll always consider that. Lynn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotohuis RoVo Posted August 14, 2008 Share Posted August 14, 2008 Under higher light contrast conditions I am using Acros 100 at iso 64 in Rodinal 1+50 which is indeed a very good combination.iso 50 or iso 32 you can use with ultra fine grain developers and Acros like Perceptol and CG512/Rollei Low Speed. The last one gives neglectible grain and still some acceptable sharpness. However it's a 24 degrees C. developer. http://www.fotohuisrovo.nl/documentatie/CG-512%20ontwikkeltabel.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profhlynnjones Posted August 15, 2008 Share Posted August 15, 2008 For any who want the information, email me and I'll send data on several films and developers. Lynn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now