tony_galt Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 It is really cold up here in Wisconsin this weekend so I've been doing more reading about LF photography than doing any. (The wind chill is below zero.) I've browsed through Edward Weston's Daybooks again and found the passage where he talks about making his famous green pepper photos. He says he shot them with a used rapid rectilinear that he got for a bargain price of $5.00. What might that lens be? <p> In general, he was always complaining about his 8x10 falling apart and wishing for a new one. Of course, he also used a Graflex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merg_ross Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 This is the lens Weston purchased used in 1924 for 25 pesos. It is an unsymmetrical form of Rapid Rectilinear and 11.25 inches focal length. It had no shutter and was used with a behind the lens Packard shutter. He later gave it to Brett (1937) and Brett in turn gave it to George Eastman House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthur_gottschalk Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 And who was the maker of this lens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_galli4 Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 Apples for Apples, $5 1924 dollars = about $250 now. You would have a nice variety in that price range on Ebay this morning. Edward had some ignorance going as he always would "modify" the aperture scale to allow apertures in the f256 range for those shots that took hours at a time. Then he would say "ruined, movement, must have been the trucks driving by" etc. AA finally clued him in in the 1940's that diffraction was killing him at those kinds of apertures. Probably what was ruining the shots. Even with diffraction a contact printed 8X10 would likely still look very good at f90 or 128. FWIW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merg_ross Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 The lens did not bear a maker's name but the iris diaphragm was marked R.O.and C. CO. (Rochester Optical and Camera Co.) The smallest opening was marked "256" which was the old "Uniform System" equivalent to f/64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred_leif Posted March 11, 2002 Share Posted March 11, 2002 I was curious about the inflation adjustment between 1924 and 2001 ... <p> http://www.westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi <p> offers a different answer, putting $5 in 1924 money at $50.03 in 2001 (it doesn't extend to 2002). <p> Still a significant bargain. Fred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_phifer3 Posted March 16, 2002 Share Posted March 16, 2002 Tony, The name rectilinear means distortionless John Henery Dallmeyer invented it in 1866 in London. The rapid type was a symetrical with two cemented pairs around a central stop. Kingslake states that,"This lens (type)was highly successfull; being fitted to fitted to all the better cameras for nearly 60 years" (Kingslake p 59, A history of the Photographic Lens). <p> Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now