samstevens Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 his wealth has gone up from $48 billion in April, 2020 to $60 billion in July 2020 Good thing, then, he donates to the right causes! :) 1 "You talkin' to me?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldog Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 Apparently, while I wasn't looking, his wealth has gone up from $48 billion in April, 2020 to $60 billion in July 2020. Apparently you can't explain you math as requested. :( Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanKlein Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 Apparently you can't explain you math as requested. :( His wealth is based on the value of his businesses. It's calculated differently than his income from the annual sales of his terminals. It's the same if you were trying to compare someone's annual salary with the value of their retirement 401K after 40 years of savings. While one affects the other, there's no exact way you can determine the value of the latter from the former. I suppose you can research Forbes to see how they calculated his wealth if they provide that info. Needless to say, however, his leasing charges for his terminals, the original discussion, have made him a very rich man. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/alanklein2000/albums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldog Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 His wealth is based on the value of his businesses. It's calculated differently than his income from the annual sales of his terminals. Needless to say, however, his leasing charges for his terminals, the original discussion, have made him a very rich man. No question he is rich and no question now, the statement you based your ”math upon” the subscription (the original topic kinda hijacked) is incorrect. Just wanted to give you the opportunity to examine what you posted prior to calculating what you assumed. Once again, fact checking, math or resolution is necessary after *some* posts. I'm on it! Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frans_waterlander Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 No question he is rich and no question now, the statement you based your ”math upon” the subscription (the original topic kinda hijacked) is incorrect. Just wanted to give you the opportunity to examine what you posted prior to calculating what you assumed. Once again, fact checking, math or resolution is necessary after *some* posts. I'm on it! Amazing how you can turn a discussion about PS Elements into a pi$$ing context! Keep it up, your contribution to the demise of yet another photography-intended forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldog Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 Amazing how you can turn a discussion about PS Elements into a pi$$ing context! Keep it up, your contribution to the demise of yet another photography-intended forum. Tell a lie once and all your truths become questionable. Speaking of photography, got anything to show us? http://digitaldog.net/files/FransPhotos.jpg Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon7 Posted December 10, 2020 Author Share Posted December 10, 2020 This is why I'm thankful I'm a gay man. Husbands are much cheaper! Waiting for a Consumer Reports comparison on this matter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now