Jump to content

Problem with old slides.


edwhite41

Recommended Posts

Nikon scanners used to have such a feature as well. It couldn't fix a really deteriorated one, but did pretty well. You can likely do just as well or better with a histogram, but it was nice to have something that did most of it with a single switch. Some of my old Ektachromes from the 1960's have become essentially orange monochromes, and there's little color to restore, but the program found a little.

 

Alas, no more Nikon scanners, I guess, and my old one doesn't like recent versions of Windows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Digital ICE was owned by ASF (Applied Science Fiction!), it had a restoration of colour (ROC) function that worked quite well. However, I think the sample shown above is too far gone for any auto-colour correction to work fully.

 

There are many scanners on the market with ICE or similar software/IR hardware restoration. Canon have their own FARE version. I think Ed Hamrick's Vuescan has a colour restoration function too, and that can be fed with an image from any source - scanner or digital camera.

 

I managed to get this result just using the curves tool. The highlight blowout could probably have been avoided working from a RAW file.IMG_20180816_173759.jpg.8ef15c74bcfa8a16e3e1d3c69581cf93.jpg

Edited by rodeo_joe|1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes, Joe, what you did looks worse than the original. It looks like zombies in Rome. (my mother was fascinated by all the cats in the forum)

 

No, I don't claim that the Epson correction was even close to perfect. The real point is, don't toss all those color shifted photos. They can be brought back to something that's not all that bad.

 

About a year ago my brother was about to toss out about 500 E3s from my parent's trip to Italy in ~1960. Pictures of the Coliseum with nobody in them we tossed, but those with my parents, I said, "not so fast". There were many examples worse than the above "before' photo, and many cases where the "after' was pretty darn good. I had never needed the auto correct feature before and was pleasantly surprised by how well it worked all by itself.

 

To get even better results, I went into my software (Paint Shop) and playing with the red in the histogram, things got a whole closer to what they looked like in the 60s.

 

So getting back to the OP, fear not, all is not lost. Those old slides that are important to you deserve a little extra TLC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I modified CHucks with "flesh tone" on PS Elements and came up with:

 

[ATTACH=full]1258121[/ATTACH]

 

Which version did you start with Alan?

I used the 'all red' original and simply used the editor on my phone - looks like it, I know.

 

Anyhow, what's obviously happened is that the cyan dye has faded badly. Raising the green and blue channel contrast should rescue anything that can be rescued.

 

Anyhow, an 8 bit JPEG isn't the ideal starting point, and a 16 bit scan will almost certainly yield a better result.

 

Since the weakness is mainly in cyan; I'm wondering if inverting the colours to negative, boosting the red channel, and then converting back to positive might work? It would save trying to adjust the green and blue channels equally.

 

Yep. That worked a lot better.

IMG_20180817_192802.jpg.c23aaabbf616224377dedb9cf0418f02.jpg IMG_20180817_192802.jpg.c23aaabbf616224377dedb9cf0418f02.jpg

Oops. Hit upload twice.

Edited by rodeo_joe|1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an improvement Joe. It's probably getting down to a matter of individual taste now but I like the truer color of the concrete. At the risk of ruining your effort, I've put a bit of warmth back into the image by manipulating the "Green" curve in Photoshop. Plus a little extra vibrance and saturation

 

In the event I was paying to get a similar original image corrected, and not expecting miracles, this is still sort of result I'd expect to receive back for my hard earned cash

Vibrance.jpg.8f5ac397af78187c2f7edf4e44788e16.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit more work on the above:

 

Massive saturation boost + a further slight tweak of the red curve and overall tone curve to lighten the shadows.

IMG_20180818_131418.jpg.0ccd85827f6b0c8ae0f62fed8ad1425e.jpg

 

I reckon this is as good as it can get from the all-red 8 bit sample posted. But as you say, it's down to personal taste (and maybe monitor calibration) at this stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are getting pretty good at this. I hope that the OP has seen what can be done. If I still had the originals (my brother does), I'd be doing some serious playing. Years ago, my father saw how badly they had faded. Too bad he's not around to see the restorations.

 

PS: Can you get my mother to turn around and smile? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, IN GENERAL I find that I prefer the results from the scanner manufacturer's software for good, clear slides but I prefer the color restoration tools in Vuescan.

 

This has a processing date of August of '67...not sure if that makes it an E3 or an E4.

 

Uncorrected

 

979849443_vuescan-grandmadolliehouseuncorrected.thumb.jpg.6b7a902b298a0daced2d879523ac7fb1.jpg

 

Vuescan "restore colors" and "restore fading"

 

686391751_vuescan-grandmadolliehouserestorecolorsandfading.thumb.jpg.9344ccab5f7e1feac21ede9475b12463.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...