Transcendence and Transformation

<p>Transcendin' and transformin' are distinct actions. Transformation is always at work in a photo. The substrate holdin' the play of light registerin' on its plane transforms not only the material on that plane, the subject's transmission and absorption too is definitely flatter. Viewing these bendy flat, mute stills at some deferred stage reanimates that work. 'opefully the attachments formed transcend the limited sight sense with affection for the material and the greater object of photography. What a great Q Fred!</p>

<p>Thanks, Anton. And thanks for your responses. Unfortunately, by the time you got involved the thread seemed to have played itself out. Hope to see you contributing in the future.</p>

<p >Hope we can still be buddies, Phylo;)). Hey, what is a few words between mates.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Chill out.</p>

<p>I'm still unpacking this one. In photographing, whatever that subject is, it then has an extra currency that may become part of a traffic in photographs. I'm considering how to trade and sell repro. rights then. Traffic sidelining with binarised fibre-optics is less probable and practical so any questions around <em>how </em>attention is paid to camerawork by audiences-critics-publishers-curators may find answers sooner. Amid some motives, I photograph to meter as objectively as possible how transforming a process it is (exploring) and critically with intent (advocating).<br>

There may be more yet.</p>