ar1 Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 Dear friends, I have a roll of Tri-X 400 (the 'new' version, code 400TX) shot at ISO 100 by mistake :( . I have only 4 developers availabe: HC-110, X-tol, Rodinal, and Ilfosol-S. What is the processing time in any of these chemicals? The only time I found (on digitaltruth.com) is 7.5 min at 20C in Rodinal 1+50. Can anybody confirm this? It's quite an important roll. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan_goulet Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I typically reduce my normal (box speed) development time 20% per stop pulled. So if my time were 10 minutes at ISO 400, then my time at ISO 100 would be 6.4 minutes. Some will say 10%, others 30%, but I have found 20% to work well for my process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john carter Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I agree 20% per stop, then if you do it again you might want to refine a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zane1664879013 Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 If it's an important roll, consider shooting another 400TX roll (or more) at 100 under similar conditions and experiment using that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_cochran Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 Don't worry. It's Tri-X, and you only overexposed it two stops. Tri-X is very forgiving of overexposure. You could develop normally, and you'd get slightly thick, but still easily printable (or scannable) negatives. Pulling a bit may make it even easier to print or scan. 7.5 minutes at 1:50 in Rodinal sounds about right for ISO 100. Standard time I use is 11 minutes in Rodinal 1:50 at ISO 400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach_abubeker Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 I recently shot 320 trix (although 220) and pulled it to 100. I used xtol at about 7min 10 sec, come out pretty well i must say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_andrews10 Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 Changing the development time affects contrast much more than film speed. So if you pull the developer by two stops you'll end up with negs that'll need a very hard grade of paper to print, or an excessive contrast boost in scanning. I'd recommend that you use a developer that loses you some film speed, like D-25, Perceptol or Microdol-X. Then pull development by no more than 1 stop. That should give you a good compromise between excessive highlight density and low negative contrast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thanz Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 I did the same thing and used D76 1:1 for 8 min. They scan great, here are a couple samples: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=50627&ppuser=489 http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=50568&ppuser=489 http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=50628&ppuser=489 camera used was a Leica M6 and 35/2 asph. summicron. good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ar1 Posted April 12, 2007 Author Share Posted April 12, 2007 I finally decided on Rodinal 1:50, 6.5 min at 20C. The film came out fine, it's hard to tell the difference between it and one exposed at 400 ISO. There is some base fog, but again I always get this from Rodinal and the new Tri-X. Thank you all for the advices! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now