Jump to content

new Tri-X development times?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

So I am shooting the new 35mm 400TX (why in the name of god did they ever change it?)

as opposed to the old TXpan.

 

Now I am seeing development times of under 5 minutes with HC-110 dilution B. Has

anyone used this and what are your results? I would prefer to use a longer development

time, with HC-110. The box of film even says that times under 5 minutes may cause

unsatisfactory results. WTF?!?!?

 

Please help (and is the old Tri-X still available?

 

Thanks

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use EI200 at 1:45 for 4.5 @68. Drop the loaded reel in the tank containing developer in the dark, agitate 15 sec, then 5/30. Works fine, just that your timing must be repeatable every time. Not necessarily accurate, just repeatable so it is the same every time.

Submerging the reels is the proper method anyway rather than pouring thru the top.

 

 

If you are still uncomfortable, increase the dilution like I did or use a water presoak.

 

Lots of people use 1:64 to increase the time.

 

One more idea would be a lift rod in an open tank and work in total darkness. You will need a second tank for fix. Forget the rinse or stop.

 

I have done lots of C-41 at 3.25 min at 100 in a stainless tank. If I can control that, you can control 4.5 at 68.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul:

 

This issue was discussed a few years ago here when they actually made the change. You might consider a search through the archives for more varied answers. Many feel the newer version is actually an improvement while others disagree. There is a shocker.

 

If you want longer development times, dilute more.

 

Andrew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we continued to use our old times with the new version. Which by the way was not the same as Kodak recommended. we are using sol. b at 68 degrees for 6 minutes.

 

 

And as suggested there is a lot of discussions about this time change all over the website.

 

Some one at Kodak did say they thought there had been a typo, but no one would say that in writing, nor has it changed; but it did make a lot of people nervous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...