johnnystiletto Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 I shot 2 rolls of Ilford HP5 Plus (ISO 400) last night. Unfortunately, I noticed that my camera's film speed was set to 125. Is there anything I can do in processing to compensate? Any advice would be super appreciated! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_cochran Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 Relax, you made an error of less than two stops, and it was in the direction of overexposure. No biggie. <p> Are you going to print in a conventional wet darkroom with an enlarger? If so, I'd just develop normally, and expect to expose a bit longer at the enlarger, or open up its lens a bit. Nobody will be able to tell you made a mistake by looking at the final prints. <p> If you're going to scan the negatives, it might pay to cut developing time a bit, maybe 30%. That will reduce contrast, which isn't so great, but the nice thing is that it will cut the density of the negatives back, keeping them within the dynamic range of the scanner. Then you can restore the contrast in photoshop when you set the black and white points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 I did some hp5 in a very high contrast scene where I grossly overexposed to get detail in a dark wood door. I then pulled in Hc110. I was at least 2-3 stops over. They print fine. I`ll post the times tonight as the records are at home. don`t worry. This is salvageable. You may even like them better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnystiletto Posted July 14, 2004 Author Share Posted July 14, 2004 Thanks everyone! I'll probably just develop normally since I will compensate during printing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patric_dahl_n Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 "I'll probably just develop normally since I will compensate during printing!" Nah, reduce the time in the developer by 30%. The contrast will be better and the grain finer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 PLEASE listen to Patric. You will get a grainy neg with blocked highlites otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_ingram Posted July 14, 2004 Share Posted July 14, 2004 <p> I regularly shoot HP5+ at 200 and dev. for the suggested time in D-76 or rodinal. No blocked highlights. The negs are, of course, a bit grainy with the rodinal, but it's not too bad. You could pull 20% off the times, but not knowing the vigor with which you agitate makes it impossible to say. </p><p> PS: My tests, and many others, indicate that the true film speed of HP5+ is most developers is 160-200, so this overexposure is close to nothing (especially if you're not spot metering).</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnystiletto Posted July 14, 2004 Author Share Posted July 14, 2004 Well, luckily I haven't processed the film yet (power's been wonky due to these summer Alabama thunderstorms). I guess it may help to let you know that some of the exposures will probably be unexposed anyway, regardless of film speed, due to the lack of light where I was shooting. So, should I still reduce dev time? I probably won't even get a chance to process until sometime tomorrow night. PS: Thanks to EVERYONE for all the advice. Also, if this info helps, I usually develop with Rodinal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j._salty Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Here's a thought... assuming you were using 35mm film, is the film factory loaded in the DX coded cassette? If your camera is one of the modern units, did the camera over ride the manual setting and use the coded film setting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_waller Posted July 15, 2004 Share Posted July 15, 2004 Cut the development time. As a rule of thumb reduce development time by 1/3 per stop downrating. Thus reduce by 33 percent for the first stop and by a further 20 percent for the next 2/3 stop. So if the dev time at 400 ASA were 12 minutes then that would be down to 8 minutes for the first stop and a further 1.5 minutes for the 2/3 stop, thus giving a time of 6.5 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnystiletto Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 to j salty: this camera is my beloved crusty old canon ae-1. we're talking about WAY before dx coding here. maybe i should have just stuck with the nikon instead.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnystiletto Posted July 15, 2004 Author Share Posted July 15, 2004 Chris: Wow! Thanks for the info! I'll be sure to remember that since I am constantly changing film speeds and forgetting to change the camera setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_schroeder Posted July 22, 2004 Share Posted July 22, 2004 In 1935, Dr Paul Wolff wrote "Give full exposure and abbreviate the development." (My First Ten Years with the Leica) Dr Wolff was the first great apostle of the Leica and 35mm photography. There is a way to minimize exposure errors. If you regularly set the exposure before using the meter, you will soon develop a feel for light. Use the meter (hand held or built in) only as a second opinion. After a while, incorrect exposure just won't feel right to you. I have done this for about fifteen years. I simplify things by only using Tri X rated at 200. The key factor is not the Tri X, but the one film and speed. Did you like the shadow detail in your roll shot at 125? You might try using it at 200 on a regular basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now