Jump to content

pedro_hing_

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

3 Neutral
  1. The stop bath removes (clean) the developer from de negative. It's a very dilueted acid solution, and it take very long do spend a bottle. I bought 1lt of aceptic acid and use it for years. So, for me it's not justify to store stop bath, and you will contamin the next negative.
  2. Hello again, I think it don't have brand, at least I never saw it. You cam fill it up by the hole after remove the tap.
  3. The best way I found to store the mixed developer, like the x-tol, is the soft bags for wine. After fill up, just squeeze to remove the air and use the tap. No air inside. Never reuse developer or stop bath.
  4. Hello again, Finally, it is developed. But the results ...are not very bad :) I've exposed it at 400 and used Rodinal 1+25, 7min, at 20ºc, and got very dense / over developed. Due to the age of the film, it would be expected to lose sensitivity, so it would take more time to develop, am I right? I wouldn't be surprised if it got under developed. Now it's drying, later I'll scan it. Based on this results, opinions for the second film are welcome. Taken with a phone
  5. Here is the paper that came in the box. Processing? Take it to your dealer. No time chart. I think i'll try the standar time on Rodinal. Once more, thank you
  6. Thank you for your replies. I byed 2 Tri-x Pan expired in 1978 on a fleamarket, and got curious about the results. I've already exposed one at EI400 and, for now, only have Rodinal. Once I developed a 40yo exposed Fujifilm SS100, and after a research I’ve opted for de standard time. It worked. The thing is that the box doesn’t show the time table, like the moderns ones. What about stand development in Rodinal? Pedro Hingá.
  7. Hello, Does any one knows de processing times for a Kodak Tri-x Pan from the 70s? 35mm film that provides only 20 frames e the box has no data. Would it be far from modern Tri-x? Best regards Pedro Hingá
×
×
  • Create New...