Jump to content

carbon_dragon

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    3,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

carbon_dragon last won the day on November 28 2018

carbon_dragon had the most liked content!

Reputation

547 Excellent

2 Followers

  1. Leica M10, 7Artisans 50/1.1 @1.1, Atlanta Botanical Garden
  2. Desperate to get out of the condo, I went to members day at the Atlanta Botanical Garden and took some pictures. This one was taken with my M10, Leica 90/2 APO.
  3. We're not quite down to the old Leica CL (full frame, interchangeable, fits in a very small belt pouch or a big pocket) but we're close in this camera as well as others, all missing some feature (size or interchangeability or full frame). Seems like a good step for Sony though, especially in the next generation.
  4. One of the ways Leica cameras typically excel (in my opinion) is that their menu system tends to be easy to understand and not too complex. That is typically true of all of them. On the other hand Sony is pretty much the opposite (gigantic multilayered menus that are a bit hard to follow, though you can do all kinds of things). I guess I'm saying most Leica made cameras would probably qualify (possibly excluding the LX100 derived DLuxes not sure).
  5. Very nice, Leica owners really owe some thanks to a company that can do what Leica can't. Of course Leica could probably have contracted with the company to do this so that M9 owners weren't just out of luck. The fact that they didn't even try isn't encouraging. Glad there is a way to fix them (or turn them into monochroms). Thanks for the post. The description of the corrosion was helpful too.
  6. If I'm not mistaken, were you to bring your camera close enough to the subject and focus only on an 18% grey card and then compare that to the incident reading (and the meters were both calibrated) I think you'd get close to the same reading. One thing you could do is to take a picture with both readings. Looking at the pictures (keep careful notes) you will see what is correctly exposed in the pictures and what each one misses. An incident meter isn't "fooled" into giving you a bad reading on a bright white subject or a dark subject, but it assumes you want to expose as if the subject is 18% grey. So if the subject IS white, it will be white in the picture (ditto black) BUT that doesn't mean that the white won't be blown out or the black blocked up. It depends on the dynamic range of the scene. So using a reflective meter you can spot meter the shadows/blacks and the highlights/whites and determine if your film (or sensor) can handle it. If not, YOU can choose whether to preserve the highlights or preserve detail in the shadows. Neither of them guarantee a good picture. Camera makers have been working on "matrix metering" and its descendants to analyze the scene (highlights and shadows) and "guess" what the best meter reading should be (rather than you doing it). Some of them are quite good, but actually using a normal meter (reflective, spot, or incident) requires you know what they measure and learn how to use them correctly.
  7. I used a Canon 7 for a while. Good little camera but as good as it was (even had a light meter built in), I still preferred the M2.
  8. Just remember that Contax RF lenses will mount to Nikon bodies but if what people have told me is true, the focusing system isn't the same so they might not focus correctly. If you try to use them anyway, I think wideangles are more likely to focus than telephotos. I have 2 Contax IIAs personally. But the Nikons are actually better, more durable cameras.
  9. After WWII when Leica's patents were invalidated, a lot of companies built copies including Nikon. I know it looks like a Contax rangefinders, but supposedly the internals were more like Leica. That said, the Nikon rangefinders kind of went away because the Leica Ms were just SO good. Given how many more lenses you can find to fit the M2 than the Nikon (which only kinda sorta takes contax RF lenses since the rangefinder focusing system was supposedly different), I'd go with the M2. That said, the Nikons are really nice looking and supposedly really well made. If you are happy with it and you can get enough lenses to satisfy you, go for it. Repairing it will probably be harder with the Nikon too but not as hard as it would with an ACTUAL contax rangefinder.
  10. This one was pretty unimaginative -- I'm not sure it was even given a name at first. It's now known as the Konica 1 I think. Nice little cheap camera that sold in the Base Exchanges of Air Force Bases after WWII (that's where my Dad bought it). I used it for years and still have it. Fixed lens, but a good one.
  11. Many Contax cameras (especially the SLRs) are basically unrepairable these days. It's going to be very hard to find anyone who has the parts. But good luck.
  12. I've always liked the R8 but I'm past the age where I could carry it and at the time I decided to try a camera like this, I selected the Contax RTS III. The lenses were way cheaper at the time! But I've always liked the way the R8 looked.
  13. Historically Photoshop CS3 but lately, I've been trying to transition to Affinity Photo.
×
×
  • Create New...