Df is a funny preposition. When it was announced what seems like many years ago, I thought it was going to be a digital Nikon FM. It was a camera that many people had wanted in the years leading up to the launch of the Df. That meant a relatively compact and affordable camera with no-nonsense controls. Despite a few design quirks where the Df seems to have lost the simplicity of the original Nikon FM, I don't think it quite got down to the size I thought it would and some of the design/styling seemed more pseudo-retro than functional (as in say the Olympus OM-D E-M5).
I think the shocker was really the cost which has made it unpopular to most people. I guess this rarity and the unwillingness of Nikon to drop the cost as it ages has kept sales numbers extremely low and used prices are high due to its rarity. I would have really liked it due to its outstanding low-light performance.
The Df is a camera that really could have done with a couple of minor revisions over the past few years to keep it relevant. If it had, a sensor change would now be due. Considering the financial constraints on Nikon, they need to concentrate on areas of growth before considering the niche that was never quite fulfilled.
I am still waiting for the compact, light but strong digital FM. In the meantime the D750 seems the closest fit although I went for the D7500 while I wait. Just not holding my breath.