husain.akhtar

Interesting that B&W has its own impact!

Not as exciting as Bill's buck.[ATTACH=full]1228382[/ATTACH]

Excellent observation and capture!

I was amazed by the design and colours of this building as well as the performance of D3300 + kit 17-55mm

And from a different point of view, this window display in Oxford Street London!

I liked this display at the Tate London!

Many thanks all! I appreciate the performance of the gear can't be detached from the photographic skills but my initial question was about the quality of the performance of the equipment. Honestly speaking, I'm very impressed by the performance of this entry level Nikon gear, compared with others in the same range or even in a higher range. For example, the sample below under available lighting - kit lens at ISO 100, 18mm at f3.5

Sorry, but you have to agree that a rather prosaic but clear photo of the sign for a business featuring the web address by a brand new member might raise some questions and I did use a question mark. Welcome aboard.

It is okay - situation clarified!

Considering what Sanford has said about the images on the Internet, I wonder what difference would it make to use, say, Nikon 16-8mm f2.8-4 while I'm getting results like (attached)

Clever Spam?!

No it is not a spam - I'm new to Nikon and was really looking for honest answers! I normally use Sony cam for stills like the one attached

Attached is 100% crop from an image by the 18-55mm kit lens on Nixon D3300 - 23mm f4.5 at 1/80 - is it good enough?

I'm wondering in what ways I might got better results if used a more expensive Nixon gear?