Jump to content

jon_aron

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p>Pardon my absence! Been away these last few days...regardless, I'm amazed to see where this conversation has gone. Thanks for responding!</p> <p>Clearly, there is no RIGHT option for 35mm scanning - especially in 2016. Go Nikon Coolscan (V, 4000, 5000 - even 2000) or go home in terms of quality. Buy a newer scanner - from Epson's flat beds to dedicated Plustek models - if you're looking for security and confidence in the ability to maintain/repair.</p> <p>Definitely want to try and play around with a couple things. Canoscan FS27270U is on the way, very close to purchasing my Nikon Coolscan V, and would love to test out a more modern scanner soon. Thanks everyone!</p>
  2. <p>David H - I think you're right, in so far as my expectations (what I say I need) are quite high, whereas my reality (the budget I have) is rather low. Perhaps this dissonance is why I'm struggling to find the right scanner for me. On the other hand, I just picked up a Canonscan FS2720U for $35 - budget, check; quality, check. So, working below a $600 price range is certainly not out of the question! In fact, I've seen several of the Coolscan (Nikon's rather amazing 35mm scanners) in the $4-700 range as well.</p> <p>Does anyone have experience with the Canoscan? How do we think this FS2720U will bode?</p> <p>Phil - the fact that your Coolscan is doing better numbers than your OpticFilm 8200i is insane. Just goes to show - timeless quality can't be beat. I'm really hoping to scoop a Coolscan myself. If I only plan to scan: 35mm; color; negative; and for the purpose of large enlargements - it really does seem ideal. Open to any objections, though.</p> <p>Which scanner is allowing you to scan at 7200? I'm interested in scanning at high resolution and down sampling, as you say. </p>
  3. <p>Thanks for the responses so far everybody. I've concluded that a flat bed scanner (such as the Epson V600) is ideal in terms of pricing. As far as quality, however, I'm still a bit weary. The flat bed scanners that I've heard of don't seem to compare to the regular scanners really. Does anyone know of a flat bed scanner that competes in terms of quality? Again, looking in the $300-600 range. </p>
  4. Hi All- After reading what feels like 100s of threads to no avail, I'm ready to ask for help. I'm in the market to invest in a 35mm scanner but the options are a little overwhelming. Some of my limitations: - Budget $300-$600 range - Scanner intended for 35mm - Quality scans for large scale printing - Dust and scratch removal a plus - Batch processing not necessary Any recc's for scanners in that range would be appreciated greatly I used to work with a Nikon CoolScan 5000, but it's since moved. That piece of hardware was a gem though. I'd love to invest in a piece like that! .
×
×
  • Create New...