Jump to content

felipe_silva

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p><strong>David Stephens</strong>, thanks for the sample and advice! <br> <strong>Robin Smith, </strong>there's a lot of 28-135 used in Brazil for something like 150-200 dollars, but all reviews say the Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5 is better...<em> Thank you!</em><br> <strong>Kenneth Katz </strong>my problem with the 100-300 is the weight, but if it is sharp at 100-200 range in f5.6-f.8 it's ok to me... <em>Thank you!</em><br> <strong>Bob Atkins </strong>The 85 1.8 is expensive here in Brazil, even used. <em>Thank you!</em><br> <strong>Alan Bryant </strong><em>Thank you! </em>Unfortunately couldn't find any :/<br> <strong>Gil Pruitt </strong>Couldn't find it ... But i'll search in some groups... <em>Thank you!</em></p> <p> </p>
  2. <p>Yes, i would like a 100mm 2.8 or 85mm 1.8, but here in brazil they are very expensive, even used they are something like 450-500 dollars... At the moment i have a 50 1.8 ii, but it bothers me when i need to get close, because of the distortion... So i would like to buy one of this zoom lenses just to have something for "close" portraits. I thought about 150-300mm because of the FOV, so i would not need something like f1.8 or even f4... </p>
  3. <p>I photograph portraits and i would like a lens that is sharp and give me reasonable bokeh at 70mm or more. </p> <p>I did a long search and found this lenses to be the best among the old EF:</p> <p>Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5<br> Tokina AF 70-210 f4-5.6<br> Canon 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM<br> Canon 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM</p> <p>Thank you very much!</p> <p> </p>
×
×
  • Create New...