fred_ritchie1

Thanks for all the input, looks like my lithos will go into Feb auction. Thanks a ton for the comeback re:Olympus lenses on a DSLR, really appreciate the specifics. Might not be the latest and greatest but I'm not either and lenses are terrific for my use.

<p>Thanks. Correct re: lithograph. I believe this print was derived from original Cibachrome print, I assume from a lithography process common to the early to mid 1980's. As I said, probably not the right forum. I am certainly ignorant on the technologies available/involved. Art appraiser here I come. From what I read, this artist's earliest works were derived from Cibachrome process and are now the more valuable (vs: Giclee, silk screen).<br> Thanks for response.<br> Another question please. I have old Olympus OM-10 SLR which is of little use now (I am strictly amature) however, the two lenses I have (Zuiko 50mm f1.2 auto macro and 35-85 close focus zoom) are excellent and I would like to use them on new Olympus DSLR.<br> 1 - Can I do this?<br> 2 - What adapters/accessories would be required?<br> 3 - Will they work on ANY Olympus DSLR? </p>

<p>Probably off topic here but we'll try. Not photography specific, certainly related. I am trying to identify medium used for Ken Keeley signed prints from the early 1980's, near the beginning of his career. I have two hand signed prints, purchased new in 1987, one showing view as it appeared pre 1972 due to subject matter in image. I have found reference to the artist using Cibachrome print technology in his early days but would like to determine absolutely. Prints are 30 1/2" x 23" & 37" x 24" believe they are too early for Giclee and at the time one heard predominately of simply "lithographs". Would such print sizes present any problems for equipment used at that time? Could anyone advise reference source for such info or if anyone has direct answer I would be most appreciative. If this is wrong forum, please advise. Thanks in advance.</p>