Jump to content

scott_carlsson

Members
  • Posts

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by scott_carlsson

  1. This kind of post is hilarious. A little over 3.5 years ago, a friend shot our wedding with 2

    Kodak/F5

    bodies- a DCS 760 and a DCS 720X. With a few Nikkor lenses and a couple of Microdrives,

    he had spent over <i>$15000.00</i> on the equipment. Now, less than 4 years later

    we've got excellent, probably better overall image quality from bodies that are well under

    $1000.00. (D70) And the on-camera Speedlite flash/fill capability blows away

    what my friend had to deal with.

     

     

    And yet the whiners and complainers are ever present, it would be so even if these current

    bodies were now down to $300.00. Some things never change.

  2. I just sent in a D70 for warranty work because it refuses to work with any of my Nikkor D

    lenses, including the 80-200, 18-35, 35-70, 85, and 105 Micro. Except for ONE-the AF-S

    24-85. It works fine with this lens. But with all the others it displays F-- in ALL camera

    modes after two-button reset, bottom button reset, firmware update, clean all mounts,

    etc., etc., etc. It just doesn't <i>like</i> any of my other lenses, or so it seems.

  3. You will far exceed the 1/250 sync with ISO 400 outdoors. You'll have to stop down to f11

    or smaller. Even in the shade, you won't get away with f2.8. Unless it's extremely overcast,

    or nearly dark. Try ISO 100 instead, and put it on a tripod.

  4. My D70 ALWAYS works fine with my AFS 24-85. I also have a Nikkor 18-35, and an AFD

    two-ring 80-200 f2.8. The 18-35 works fine for maybe 5-6 frames, then D70 shows F--,

    no matter what mode camera is in. Will not fire. Turn off and on again, reset camera-will

    not fire with that lens. Same exact scenario with the 80-200. Starts off fine, then F-- after

    several frames. I have also a Nikkor AF 105 Micro, no problems whatsoever with D70 and

    that lens.

     

    This is with JPEG and RAW. I always keep all mounts, camera and lenses very clean.

     

    Nikon Tech support doesn't have a clue, over the phone anyway.

     

    What gives?

  5. <i>But for now, 8mp of resolution from a DSLR like the 20D or XT is good enough for

    portraiture and stock.</i>

     

     

     

    More than a few of the big stock houses will NOT except 6-8Mp SLR images, or even 12Mp

    images from the D2X. They want full-frame SLR images, being the Canon 1DS or 1DSMKII,

    SLR/n, or higher Mp digital back captures.

     

    In other words, if you're thinking about breaking into stock with your 20D, forgetta bout

    it.

  6. I agree with Thom Hogan. <i>For the money, we expect more camera</i>. The extended

    dynamic range and 12Mp isn't enough to make it worth anywhere near $2500.00. It's still

    a morphed Nikon plastic body too. I own the S2 Pro, and it wasn't worth what it

    cost new either. I paid $1000.00 used, and it's a fine camera for that amount of money,

    and still more than holds its own in terms of pure image quality.

     

     

    Fuji, for whatever reason, just doesn't get it. The 20D is the clear choice.

  7. Yes, it's F-- on any aperture . Cleaned mounts again, which weren't really dirty to begin

    with, still no worky. Funny, mostly because, I also have a Fuji S2, F100, and F5. No

    problems with those bodies. The D70 just doesn't like the lens. I have rentals to bring

    back to my dealer today, I'll bring the D70 and the lens along and see what they might

    have to say.

     

    Thanks all.

  8. If film, I would suggest an F100, I've seen a lot of them lately going for less than $600.00

    used, and in nice condition. It's 99.9% of the F5, and you'll save a few hundred $$. If

    digital and

    right now, it's a no-brainer- D70.

  9. I never understood the desire for this camera in any of its forms. Maybe 15-20 years ago,

    just because it was the top "F" camera. FAR better off now with an F100, FM3A, FE2, FM2,

    in that order. The low flash sync never made a damn bit of sense then, it certainly doesn't

    now.

  10. I use both the Fuji S2 and a D70. As good as the S2 is, I don't think the successor S3 can

    justify $2500.00. After using the D70 for quite awhile now, I would say that it is a better

    camera in every way than the S2, except maybe for the S2's ability to supply a slightly

    finer, larger print off the Epson.

     

    And seeing the early remarks about the S3's performance can't convince me to justify

    nearly 3 times the price of the D70. I think I would sooner switch to a 20D, or wait for the

    D100 replacement, or put the $$$ toward the D2X, etc.

×
×
  • Create New...