lance_mickel

<p>Thanks all for the reply!<br /><br />I did a little bit more research and might start considering just narrowing the choices down to these cameras:<br /><br />Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II<br />Fujifilm X-T1<br />Sony Alpha a7<br /><br />Do you guys have any opinions of these and how they stack up? They all look good to me.<br /><br />Thanks!</p>

<p>Hi,<br> I recently sold my Canon T4i camera and lenses because I wanted to switch to a smaller compact mirrorless camera. I will be doing a lot of travelling/backpacking and I felt lugging around a full sized DSLR with 2 lenses will be very cumbersome. I recently came back from a 10 day hike in Patagonia with the camera and 2 lenses and it was hell.<br> My question is based on these cameras, which one of these is the best to shoot landscape with? I would like a camera that gives deep color saturation and depth in photos.<br> Leica D-Lux (Type 109)<br />Fujifilm X100T<br />Panasonic LX100<br />Samsung NX500<br />Sony A6000<br />Olympus OM-D E-M5 II<br> Are there any other cameras you guys would recommend?<br> I have owned a Sony DSLR before too but have had very bad experiences with Sony and their customer service that I prefer to stay away from the A6000 but if it's a good option then I guess I can go with it.<br> I would prefer to stay around $1200 for my budget but I can stretch it to $1500 if needed. I would prefer to have something with an interchangeable lens. I want to be able to use the wide angle lenses.<br> Also do you think it'll be worth it for me to get the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II with an lens or NX500/A6000 with two lens?<br> Thanks!</p>