naveed_ahmed2

<p>Very valid points, and it would be near impossible to detect over and under exposure when the picture is intentionally bright or dark.</p>

<p>Ok, thanks everyone, looks like it's pretty much unanimous that there's no need for it.</p>

<p>I'm considering writing a Windows application that can detect:<br /><br />- underexposed photos<br />- overexposed photos<br />- shaken photos<br />- blurred out of focus photos<br />- and pick the best (clearest) of a set of similar/duplicate photos<br /><br />Is this something you would use? How much would you be willing to pay for something like this?<br /><br />What features would you like to see?</p>

<p>I have a Pentax K3 and love it mostly. I've been wanting the Canon 70D for it's touchscreen and flip screen and I got one during the black friday refurb sale and really love it too. The K3 is a fine camera, but I guess I'm a bit of a feature fiend and I love the idea of being able to touch a point on the touch screen and have the camera focus there and take a picture too. The wifi functionality and tethering is really nice too. The autofocus on the canon's with their silent focus is really much better than Pentax's screw drive and unreliable SDM (I'm looking at you 16-50mm).</p> <p>That said, I'm probably going to keep both for now.</p> <p>Briefly tried the Nikons, but I find their controls counter-intuitive, the Pentax is the best IMO. The Canon has improved and has been helped with the touch screen, but still has room for improvement.</p>