<p>Hi all....just bought a second hand EF24-70mm f/2.8L USM. Serial number indicates it was manufactured in 2005. It's feels good and looks well taken care of.<br /> I thought I'd compare it to the lens I got with my 60D, the EF-S18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS.<br /> I set up a very quick test...shot the same scene once with each lens both shots at 40/43mm (I eyeballed the zoom setting for the kit lens so it's off by 3mm), 1/160, f11, iso 100, studio flash with my 60D.<br /> Well, these crops seem to tell me there's virtually no difference between the two lenses...in fact I'd give the edge to the kit lens!<br /> I know a lens is about more than image quality...it's also about build and other factors (the 24-70 being faster and constant aperture for instance) but I was kind of expecting at least a mildly notable jump in image quality. Am I off base in my thinking?<br /> If you'd like to see my test, here it is...full shot provided for reference, the crops are full size.<br /> I'd welcome any wisdom/thoughts on the matter. Thanks, D<br> Image here (I hope it can be viewed full size)<br> http://imgur.com/DKJhESV</p>