joshua_son
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by joshua_son
-
-
Ok Noel, thanks for the advice. Does exposure time have more
affect on the developing than the developer itself? If I expose
the paper for a minute and a half I get a decent exposure with
some negatives. Others have needed longer than that, I see
people using times of just 20-30 seconds and it leads me to
believe that A. They have a brighter bulb in their enlarger thus
leading to shorter exposure times, or B. They are getting much
more out of the developer than I am. I leave it in the dektol for
about 3-4 minutes usually.
By exposing the negative at half box speed do you mean in
camera when actually taking the shot to treat iso 400 film as if it
is 200? I did notice that in some instances on this neopan roll
that shots which should have been well exposed came out at
very thin negatives. And my developing time was fight on the
dot. Whereas the tmax I developed at iso 400 came out much
better. Some of the neopans was good but others where pretty
much unsalvageably thin.
I am using 8x10 papers but im about to buy a box of 5x7 once I
can get a hundred sheets so cheaply. I plan on actually
shooting film for some portraits and weddings alongside my
digital so I will be in the blackroom alot practicing.
-
I have it hooked directly to a timer, I set a time and it comes on
and exposes it for that long. I assume the shiny side of the
paper is the one I am supposed to be exposing. The brand of
my enlarger is hansa. Its not super expensive. Just a basic rig
-
Well I got a second roll developed. Some neopan 400. Now im
trying to figure out my paper exposure times. It seems like alot
of people only expose for 12 to 30 seconds? When I did strip
test with the aperture set to f8 it took about a minute and 45
seconds to get a good exposure. How much does does your
developer affecf the print? Im using dektol 1:2
-
Ok so I checked all my developer and the problem was some
fixer left in the tank. Went through a roll today at the park and it
developed :) my first roll of film ever. And no I did not squeal like
a school girl...well a little. I let them dry out with little issue then
it was to the enlarger with them. I tinkered around with times
and such a little but the one thing I keep noticing is white spots
on the photos. They correspond with little hard dots on the
negative. I assume that this is due to my having mishandled the
film in some way. Anyone know where I screwed up? Sorry to
keep asking questions but im young and inexperienced.<div></div>
-
Thats probably what happened then. I didn't clean it out not
thinking about it. Ill try again with another roll tonight. Good
thing I put the used chemical in a separate bottle.
-
Oops sorry about the typo. It was hp5. I ruined that roll by
improperly loading the reel. (Dont ask). The roll that came out
completely clear was kodak trix400. I just checked my xtol from
the same bottle like you suggested ( I stored it in 5 1 liter
bottles) and it definitely is still alive and well. I also checked the
shutter on my ae1 to make sure that it is working and it is
working normally. When winding I get the squeal but other than
that all is well.
I know I didnt use fixer first. I have my fixer in a gallon jug and
my xtol in 1 liter bottles. The only way fixer was in there was if
some was still in the tank from my last roll I developed a few
minutes beforehand. I didnt rinse it out but had dumped it.
Could the small amount of kodafix in the tank from the previous
roll kill the xtol before it could develop the new one? If so I think
I have my answer.....stupid me lol.
-
John,
If the tank still had a little fixer left in it from the last roll of film
would that have killed it? I have all my bottles very clearly
marked so I didn't mess up there. But I don't think I rinsed the
tank out as it didn't come to mind...im using the liquid kodafix
diluted to film solution. I understand if I made a stupid mistake
as its my first time. Just want to get it right for the next roll. The
one im now afraid to develop has some shots from a recent trip
to Mexico. I might put off developing it and shoot a few rolls of
another film to practice on..
-
No markings at all. There is one section about 3 or 4 inches
long on one end that is pretty dark then on the other end about
8 or 9 inches that is darker than the rest of the film but not as
dark as the three inches at the other end.
Hopefully that makes sense.
-
<p>Hello.</p>
<p>I just recently got into film shooting. Im from a small town and nobody I know shoots film or ever has before except for the grouchy owner of the local photo shop. I went for bw film in a canon ae1 since I already had lenses for the fd system. I shot my first 2 rolls of film (illford hp4 iso 400 and trix400 pushed to 1600) and went to develop them tonight. I just finished mixing my xtol and diluting my stop bath and fixer all from kodak. I majorly screwed up the development on the hp5 (loaded the reel wrong) but when I went to develop the roll of trix400 it came out totally blank! I used xtol 1:1 and followed kodaks recommended 12 minute development time for film pushed to 1600. I am absolutely positive that my shutter works, I didn't accidentally use fixer first, amd my developer should have been 20 degrees c. It has me really confused and im wondering what it could be? Surely the developer couldnt have died within an hour of mixing it? I put it in 5 1 liter pet bottles. </p>
<p>Really hope some more experienced individuals can help me out with this. If I left out any important info let me know. I did this all in a dark room lit only by a safety light. Maybe I left the fixer in too long?</p>
first time developer help?!
in Black & White Practice
Posted
Im using illford bw IV multigrade rc deluxe paper. No filters. It is
glossed on one side and not the other so im pretty positive the
glossed side is the right side of the paper to point the enlarger
at. I am also using dektol 1:2. I guess I will just have to acxept
the long times as a quirk of this enlarger until I can get a nicer
one