Jump to content

mrjallen

Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mrjallen

  1. Hello mrjallen

    You can develop XP-2 in HC110 B&W chemicals which make it easier if you have developed B&W film before, check this thread on Photrio.

     

    Ilford XP2 Super in B&W chemicals

     

    First off, thanks for linking to that thread. It was absolutely fascinating reading.

     

    Second, I have never developed any film of any type before. This upcoming foray into processing film at home will be my inaugural attempt. With 10 rolls of C-41 that have accumulated over the past year, I decided to develop myself rather than send out.

     

    With ten rolls ready, certainly I'll have a few keepers that I can then scan in. Every weekend for much of the past number of years, I've followed this forum. I just haven't had the time, or made it, to participate. Ultimately, I hope my son will take an interest in it, as well. He's the creative one!

     

    IMG_20190928_125904196.thumb.jpg.774e2accf908ddaaf277eec27328a67a.jpg

    • Like 3
  2. Regarding OP's question, I have no plans for mirrorless, as much as I might enjoy such a system. I am just now in the process of upgrading from a D40(!) to a D7100, allowing me to more effortlessly use my manual focus lenses and my one AF-D lens. The AF-D lens came free with an N90s, which I'm also enjoying.

     

    Moving from early 2000s technology to 2013 technology will give me much better low light, flashless capability, at half the cost of my original D40 purchase.

    • Like 1
  3. How about a 20 dollar N8008? It's built tough enough that even a teenage boy

    can handle it, costs less than an F80 or F100, and offers a blend of the features

    of both early modernity and the late Pleistocene. If the back is already sticky,

    just borrow some of the lad's skateboard tape for a field-expedient repair!

  4. <p>I am also shooting some film these days, and I like the look it gives. With my local Costco no longer processing and scanning film at $5 per roll, I now have to use a local lab that costs $15 per roll. At this price, I might be better off just to get a scanner, saving the pro lab for only those shots for which I would like a nice print.</p>
  5. <p>Somewhere in the house, there is a shoebox. Inside that shoebox, there are dozens of mountaintop pictures (negatives and prints) taken over several summers in the late 1990s in Colorado, as I made my way up a number of mountains to their peaks. Perhaps I'll find that box sometime.</p>

    <p>In the meantime, the below shot represents my favorite--a view from the peak of Mt. Sherman. There had been complete cloud cover the entire hike up. While on the peak, I saw the clouds break. I took a couple of shots, one of which came out nicely. Unfortunately, this is a bad scan of the print, not of the negative...{now where is that shoebox?}<br /> <br />Probably Kodak film from Walmart, scanned either by the REI mail-in photo service or some competitor.</p><div>00cr2e-551372584.jpg.ce55e5bbc888cd696833ae2f71476c9d.jpg</div>

  6. <p>Costco recently quit developing/scanning in my area as well. Their scans were great. </p>

    <p>I just used a local independent lab for the first time, and it costs 2.5 times per roll more than Costco. I'm trying to build up the nerve to try my hand at developing at home, but the time needed would compete too heavily with my family commitments and other hobbies. Even so, I'm going to look into it a bit, per the encouraging comments from Randall and Bruce above.</p>

  7. <p>Thanks, Mike and Michael.</p>

    <p>Although I said 1997 up above for my original purchase, I think now that it was 1996. I read about the camera in, perhaps, Outside magazine, and I bought it for its supposed great lens. However, it's the right-angle finder that I liked. Realistically, I am not sure I could tell any qualitative differences with the lens as opposed to any other because I always got my film developed at local labs (Walmart, for example) or the occasional mail-out service. Unfortunately, I cannot find the negatives for those pics, or others I took back in the late 90s and early 2000s--thus, my reliance on low-end Walmart scans for the above pics. I edited the pics a bit on my computer, lightening the shadows to reveal some extra detail and smoothing out the grain just a bit.</p>

    <p>I plan on using it more often now and getting the film developed at a "real" place that does high-res scans. Of course, I have toyed with the idea of selling it on the famed auction site, since this camera draws unreasonable prices. Too bad I didn't keep the original packaging for it. By selling the camera, I could buy a nice old Nikkor 135mm or larger lens and have money left over. We'll see.<br>

    <br /> The river above is the Black Warrior River in west-central Alabama--the Redneck Riviera, as we call it.</p>

×
×
  • Create New...