rajath_thomson

<p>well i do own a 5d mk3 for my daily purpose ,well my aim is that i just wanted to get some feel of the film photography , i wont be clicking much so processing cost i dont mind , rather than that i wanted the camera that is quite antique and as well as able to click decent images , ive heard that there is a substitute for the mercury cells and i did love the sharp pictures posted on the net from the electro 35 camera , but i loved the feel and look of the box cameras which attracted me more towards them , but i really dont know if the box ones will be a right choice as i dont want my first buy to set me down. <br> next point im worried about is the size of the digital scanned , isnt the 35mm scanned too small ? i wanted it to be atleast quite large like most standard digital camera sizes atleast. i checked out the dslr method of scanning the films, dont know how effective it is but that seemed quite economical as i wont be spending in processing then .<br> fred - nice point there , yup ill prefer a better quality over total number of frames shot <br> dave - that helped to clear a lot of my doubts ! , well the batteries in the electro 35 cameras are not there , so how do i check if its working ? isnt electro supposed to mean fully electronic mechanism ? so will the shutter work without battery ?</p>

<p>im a beginner and i dont have any film camera yet and was searching for a good deal , please help me out<br> 1. canon canonet electro 35 for $59, very clean looking , dont know about working<br> 2. yashica electro 35 for $59 , very clean looking , dont know about working<br> 3. brownie 6 20 e for $42 , very good condition<br> 4. brownie 6 20 f for $42 , very good condition<br> 5. afga click 3 for $33 - clean , almost new<br> 6. yashica mat 124 for $100 - lens almost clean, focus ring working , not really sure about the other two rings in front , name plate missing , external body average condition</p>

<p>haahaah , thanks ill not buy this :)</p>

<p>the owner is giving this rolleiflex for 76 dollars , the rollei looks pretty worn from outside , but i think the lenses are not much affected , the details on the lenses are :carl zeiss jena nr 2164748 tessar 1:3.5f =7.5cm , heidoscope anastigmat 1:2.8 frankie and heidecke braunschweig , here is the image http://www.photo.net/photo/17796291</p><div></div>