demir_kaya

<p>The problem is in my hometown really there is no good quality photographer.. i am not kidding..<br> i know much more thing about photography than so-called photographer in our town.. they are 18-200 type photographer unfortunately.. <br> and this is not with price.. they are my friend. and i also want to make a portfolyo about wedding.. <br> because of that i am now too much away from my safestudio :) </p> <p>i am happy with the primes.. <br> but want to try one 70-200.. maybe i like it. if i am not it is easy to sell again i think.. </p> <p>we will see :)<br> thanks the weedding is next week.. i will share my result.. </p>

<p>So buy the cheap 70-200 f:4 non is and try to adapt.. and then buy its brother f:2.8 II..<br> or i will continue with primes.. <br> thanks for now..</p>

<p>What about Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC APO OS HSM on FF..<br> i think this is very good coverage from my side.. it is better than 70-200 i think.. but nobody write anything about it.. <br> 50 is perfect and finish at the 150 is not a problem for me? <br> so here is my idea.. <br> 70-200 f:4L non is or Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC APO OS HSM? <br> or tamron 24-70 vc ??</p> <p> </p>

<p>i dont have any experience about wedding.. when i look the others.. all have atleast one 70-200..<br> so i begin to think if i miss the point?<br> <br />...</p>

<p>Thanks for the quick reply..<br> as i worked only primes nearly last 5 years i am getting use to it. but the problem is not in a wedding time.. i know it would be cost some problem to not have a zoom lens.. <br> because of that i am now consider to but 70-200 f:4 non is.. <br />for quick poses.. it is not very expensive.. and i buy this cheap stuff to see myself if i am capable of using it.. <br> i dont know why but i really cant deal with the zooms.. their optical quality is not satisfy me.. maybe i just too overreacted.. </p> <p>and one 35 f:1.4L (always want one :) probably after the wedding.. <br> the rent is not a choice. our country is not big as yours:) </p> <p>or sell the 24mm.. buy 24-70 f:2.8 <br> sell the 85mm.. buy 135 f:2 L </p> <p>14mm <br> 24-70<br> 50mm<br> 135mm<br> and maybe put 135mm in crop to find more range? <br> i am not a too tele man. i want to be in the place :)</p> <p> </p>

<p>Hi there.. i am crious about if am i ready or not for a wedding..<br> i am approx 12 year in a hobby photographer. love to use primes. know lots of things about flashes etc. BUT in a planned position.. i done outdoor shooting with flashes with 60*60 softbox.. i am fairly good at ps.. i can call myself expert with my new tool wacom pro intodus.. <br> i can give life the dead photos.. but i dont want to take dead photos :) <br> i have 4 flash. 1 canon and 3 youngnuo.. i can sync them and know how to control them.. <br> but my problem is about primes.. <br> i have<br> rokinon 14mm f:2.8<br> canon 24mm f:2.8<br> canon 50mm f:1.4<br> canon 85mm f:1.8<br> canon 5dm2 as a prime. with grip.. <br />7d as a second and unwanted senarios..</p> <p><br />2 tripod one x055 pro and one small but useful light one. (think to use light one in case a long exp..)<br> i think to go with one 60*60 softbox and 2 flashes on it with an assitant (my bro :) to cary around to light in a bad situation. <br> and have 3 reflektor <br> 60cm<br> 80cm<br> 100*150 cm.</p> <p>so am i buy a zoom lens? <br> or go with 200 or 135 f:2 another prime? </p> <p>i have budget but want to buy a lens which is build for wedding.. <br> 70-200 f:4 is on my list.. maybe cheap non is ver.. ( i am good at bad light situation with my flashes.. i dont think to use is but who knows:)<br> dont want to buy f:2.8 version. i had one and i dont like it. at 200 with 2.8 is useless i think.. <br> but i also consider tamro 70-200 F:2.8 vc..</p> <p>so what is your opinion about this situation? </p> <p>which lens you will buy if you are in my shoes?</p> <p>thanks. the wedding is appx 10 days ahead.. :)</p>