<p>Hi,<br>
I'm going to move across continents and can't take everything along, in addition I need the money. So one of my Rolleiflexes has to go. But which one shall I sell? Which one is better and should I keep? Why? The 2.8F light meter is of course great, but I do like the age of the 2.8C. From your experience which one makes better pictures, has better glass? (I don't notice the difference myself yet as shoot only about 3 photos a month).</p>
<p>2.8F (type 1 1960-1966)<br />Serial 24024xx<br />Heidosmat 1:2.8/80 (serial 8525xx)<br />Carl Zeis Planar 1:2.8 f=80mm (serial 27283xx)<br />"made in Germany" Franke & Heidecke<br />Synchro Compur<br />light meter working accurately<br />using it with good results, but maybe due a CLA/overhaul</p>
<p>2.8C (type 2 1954/55)<br />Serial 14681xx<br />Heidosmat 1:2.8/80 (serial 7295xx)<br />Carl Zeis Planar 1:2.8 f=80mm (serial 12435xx)<br />Franke & Heidecke Braunschweig<br />using it with good results, but maybe due a CLA/overhaul</p>
<p>Your advise with reasoning is much appreciated. Thanks,</p>
<p>Kris</p>
<p> </p>
