Jump to content

Rod Sorensen

Members
  • Posts

    418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rod Sorensen

  1. I think it would be difficult to require everybody who posts to identify the species, but we can certainly suggest people to do so. In my case, if I post something unusual, as once in a while I visit some far corners of the earth to photograph, I would identify the species. But if it is something common around North America, e.g. great blue herons, great egrets, brown pelicans, etc. etc., I might not do so. I do aware that something very common to me is not necessarily common for someone who lives in a different continent.

     

    On the other hand, if you have questions about any image, please feel free to ask for bird or animal ID. I find that most people here are more than happy to share.

     

    Stay safe and happy holidays.

     

    P.S. Years ago I was with a photo group from the US visiting Kangaroo Island in Australia. We saw a wallaby (essentially a smaller type of kangaroo) on road side. A few of us quickly set up 500mm lenses on tripods to photograph it. Some locals walked by and asked what we were doing. I am sure wallabies are like squirrels in the US. They thought us tourists were crazy and walked away.

    I guess there are more people that DON’T share my sentiment. For me the photography and the learning go together. And I was thinking it would be something people could do voluntarily if they knew the species or wanted to learn it before posting. Some already do it. But I understand this is a photography forum and appreciate the reasons suggested for not doing this.

  2. Not sure if this is a Cooper's or a Sharp-Shinned Hawk.

    49601926778_e644cd40f8_b.jpg

    Dieter, If your other pictures at Flickr are the same hawk, I’d probably go 70/30 for Cooper’s. Always a tough one for me, especially when I’m trying to identify at a distance, in flight, through binocs.

  3. Short-eared owl at Buena Vista Grasslands, WI on 1/4.

    Can’t claim to be overly excited by the image quality - combination of being fair distance away, right at or a little after sunset, fast motion and probably poor operator technique.

    Nevertheless, these are beautiful, graceful and gregarious acrobats that are a joy to watch.

    339A34A0-4719-46D2-9BE5-36A3FD58362B.thumb.jpeg.0530841af0ec4296776c86e5656e0dc1.jpeg

    • Like 5
  4. This bird we are discussing certainly looks to me like it could be a Marbled Godwit. If that bird is common in the area where the image was taken and the Hudsonian would be uncommon to rare, why exactly are we still thinking that might be what it is? Maybe I'm too pragmatic or not wishful enough. This sort of reminds me of the eastern and western meadowlark. If you see a meadowlark in the eastern or western range, then you know which it is. If you are in the uncommon part where the ranges overlap, then it could be either and you can only positively identify by hearing the song. It seems like we are talking about a "western meadowlark in the west". I thinks it's a western. :)
  5. Rod....I volunteer at Lady Bird Wildflower Center. I usually see a Roadrunner every day on Arboretum Trail.

    Bill,

    Was in Austin for a meeting in late October and visited LB for the first time. Great place that I hope to visit again. Thanks for your volunteer service.

    I’m not sure what trail this was on, but it was in the area of the family garden. Must be a little habituated, because it wasn’t as skittish as roadrunners I’ve seen in the wild.

    Rod

    • Like 1
  6. A spideog- unrelated to North American variety . Our jays and goldfinches look different too I’ve learned!

    Yes, indeed. I might have seemed ignorant, but I did know this was a European Robin. It is just interesting how different it looks (prettier than the American Robin in my opinion), and the fact that the two robins aren't even of the same genus.

  7. Rod, the photos were taken without a telescope, simply a telephoto lens (600 mm equivalent) on a night (9/8/2012) when the moon and Jupiter were in close conjunction. Our moon is way too bright to get both it and and the image of Jupiter's moons in one shot. So the moon and Jupiter were shot separately and combined in PS. Details on the shot as follows:

     

    Panasonic FZ200 at full zoom

     

    Moon was shot at ISO 100 f/6.3 for 1/80 sec

    Jupiter and its moons were shot at ISO 800, f/3.2 for 1/10 sec and I took 7 shots and stacked them in PS. The stacking is not necessary to see the moons but it helps to decrease the noise.

    Thanks, Tom.

×
×
  • Create New...