blaise_duchemin

<p>JayDann, <br> I missed your post. Thank you for the links, it is inspiring.<br> I know what I am trying is a bit of a long shot but I feel like I have to go to the bottom of this. It is also a fun 100% analog experiment to carry out with the kids. I will post the results (if any...)</p>

<p>Ok,<br> I have practiced rolling the film back with a ruined 120 film. I have managed to do it without creating the slightest buldge, although my hands feel terribly numb now from all the pulling I had to do to keep a proper tension.<br> Step 1 should be ok so. Now it is all about the Rolleiflex film advance being consistent enough to properly align the two sets of shots. I will experiment during the week-end and let you know.<br> Many thanks to all</p>

<p>Hi Ferdi,<br> So are you saying that it should be Ok with the automatic film loading of the Rolleiflex?<br> Worth a try anyway...</p>

<p>Hi all,</p> <p>I have a project I want to do this week-end with my daughter. <br> We want to shoot a full roll of objects inside our house (with a proper lighting to create nice effects), then go out and shoot people and landscapes.<br> I have done double exposures before but only frame by frame. What I intend to do here is shoot a full roll then rewind it and reload.<br> My concerns are :<br> - Is it possible / wise to unroll an exposed film an roll it again backwards ?<br> - Once that is done, what are the chances the two sets of 12 will overlap ? Is the Rolleiflex advance mechanism accurate enough to advance the film the same way the two different times ?<br> Any other suggestions / ideas are welcome.<br> PS : I also have a 500CM would it be a better option ?<br> Many thanks</p>