s_mark
-
Posts
20 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by s_mark
-
-
<p>This issue seems to have completed died. Has everyone given up? Apparently RMFL is still in the rip-off business.</p>
-
<p><em>"He said they do not always respond to emails is because they get so much junk." </em><br>
Yet he has an email link on his website under the heading<br>
Contact Information:<br>
<strong>Email:</strong> <strong><a href="mailto:info@rockymountainfilm.com">info@rockymountainfilm.com</a></strong><br>
Their mailing address also appears. Funny how he must check that mail because he receives checks there, but why when we know he receives so much junk mail in his mailboxe.<strong><br /></strong></p>
-
<p>What did you expect?<br>
"We have been in business for over 30 years and take great pride in our ability to obtain images from your old films. Our lead technicians have over 100 years of combined experience..."<br>
<br />RMFL = ROTFLMAO</p>
-
<p><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=6044588">Lance Waterman</a> , Aug 10, 2010; 03:29 p.m. Thanks for the last post Jo Howell! I called the number 303 364 6444, talked to the lady and she found our film straight away! The lady said they'll send the film back within two weeks.<br>
Lance, did you receive it?</p>
-
<p>I received the Dock memo and the objection deadline notice of August 26.<br>
Mr. Kidd, will you be able to advise us about how to file an objection?</p>
-
<p>"His reorganization plan calls for NO ONE other than tax authorities (IRS, State of Colorado, City of Aurora) and his mortgage company to be paid."<br>
Is the city and state claiming sales tax is owed on services never performed? If RMFL never performed the services for which it received deposits, then there shouldn't be any sales tax collected in those cases. Maybe the Colorado sales tax rules allow that.</p>
-
<p>Kelly, what's with all the semi colons in your ramblings?</p>
-
<p>Is there any reason to file the Proof Of Claim Form if no refunds will be issued?</p>
-
<p>Kelly,<br>
The purpose of this forum thread is to discuss RMFL. Because this isn't the place, and because I'm not obligated to you in any way to explain my qualifications and background, I therefore refer you to Mr. Kidd's reply above.</p>
-
<p>He has the gall to tell us "Please do not... contact the Court..." Hilarious.</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>"That means all of his customers are S.O.L. in terms of getting their money back."<br>
Just as I previously wrote - we, the true victims, won't see any justice.</p>
-
<p>Not that it's actually relevant to the topic, but I'll explain my message that "RMFL didn't run out of capital. Scammers never do."<br>
RMFL became scam, it hasn't functioned as a legitimate business for years. It doesn't require any "capital" to run a scam. They took our money knowing we would never see our processed film.<br>
Their website is still up.</p>
-
<p>Kelly is confused when writing "In this sad case the low bidder crashed; ran out of capital."<br>
I never asked for anyone to bid on processing my film. I never even saw another company's price for processing my film.<br>
RMFL didn't run out of capital. Scammers never do.<br>
Rather than civil proceedings against RMFL, Dock, and "Leah" should face criminal charges.<br>
If I had the wherewithal to do so, I guarantee you that Dock and Leah would wish that they had never heard of film. I would ensure that the rest their pathetic lives exist only to endure the remedy, many times over, of the justice that their victims so much deserve.</p>
-
<p>According to the IRS, the equipment has been released.</p>
-
<p>I received the the bankruptcy court proof claim forms.</p>
-
<p>"...it's time for them to do the right thing."<br>
What makes you think that thought would ever cross their mind's? They're nothing but scammers. In the end, the justice system will somehow protect and restore RMFL without ever doing anything to help their victims.</p>
-
<p><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=6043141">Joseph A Kidd</a> wrote: "This guy is just plain bad."<br>
He's a crook, and so are his employees. I think the way he conducts "business" across state lines should earn much more attention than it has. If I had the time and means to do so, I would make it my goal to put him out of business and prosecute him and his employees to the fullest extent of the law. I'm glad Mr. Kidd is doing all that he has done.<br>
Mr. Kidd, how does he continue to get authorization from the credit card companies to steal from the public? Wouldn't that be one avenue to pursue?</p>
-
<p>I read all the threads.<br>
Specifically, do you expect to see any money? I could sue, but is it realistic to expect to receive the monetary award or my film?<br>
Also, how is it his site remains published?<br>
Can criminal charges could be filed against Dock?<br>
Did you determine if his house was sold?<br>
Thanks.</p>
-
<p>"Today the court awarded me a judgment against Steven Dock in the amount of $4700."<br>
What, in effect, does that mean? I've been waiting for my film for two years. BBB complaints are a waste of time other than for warning others. Filed a compliant with Colorado AG office.</p>
Rocky Mountain Film Lab - WARNING
in The Wet Darkroom: Film, Paper & Chemistry
Posted