Jump to content

drjanson

Members
  • Posts

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by drjanson

  1. <p>I had a different photo picked out for this week, but went with Matt's sentimental suggestion.<br>

    This is Bailey, wistfully looking out the window at her "boyfriend" - a 6' 5" neighbor who loves dogs (Bailey doesn't care much for other dogs - she prefers people).</p><div>00XZCq-294939584.jpg.2761fbd381dc501d62a8c589168c81fa.jpg</div>

  2. <p>Great images so far today. And thanks for the kind words last week from Bill Nelson and Greg K.<br>

    This week's image was taken in the historic Hotel Lafayette in Buffalo. The hotel was designed and built for the 1901 Pan-American games. I was granted access for some pre-renovation photos and happened across this scene.</p><div>00XQph-287833684.jpg.cb16f3734d80286938e830f76a96f040.jpg</div>

  3. <p>First of all, I have not used the Nikon 17-55mm. However, my input on the Tamron is that the first copy I used (purchased online) had difficulty autofocusing except on the middle AF point (D90). Also, I could not get a sharp image at f/2.8 (my reason for buying the lens). I went back to the drawing board. While visiting a local shop, I tried a copy in-house at f/2.8 - no problem. I purchased the lens and used it that weekend on a wedding shoot with very good results. I think with the combination of getting a good copy (visit a store) and the Vibration Control feature, the lens will work out as a positive purchase.</p><div>00XL05-283109584.jpg.08a0b585bf990d4039a640cbfab26c59.jpg</div>
  4. <p>First of all, I have not used the Nikon 17-55mm. However, my input on the Tamron is that the first copy I used (purchased online) had difficulty autofocusing except on the middle AF point (D90). Also, I could not get a sharp image at f/2.8 (my reason for buying the lens). I went back to the drawing board. While visiting a local shop, I tried a copy in-house at f/2.8 - no problem. I purchased the lens and used it that weekend on a wedding shoot with very good results. I think with the combination of getting a good copy (visit a store) and the Vibration Control feature, the lens will work out as a positive purchase.</p>
  5. <p>First of all, I have not used the Nikon 17-55mm. However, my input on the Tamron is that the first copy I used (purchased online) had difficulty autofocusing except on the middle AF point (D90). Also, I could not get a sharp image at f/2.8 (my reason for buying the lens). I went back to the drawing board. While visiting a local shop, I tried a copy in-house at f/2.8 - no problem. I purchased the lens and used it that weekend on a wedding shoot with very good results. I think with the combination of getting a good copy (visit a store) and the Vibration Control feature, the lens will work out as a positive purchase.</p>
  6. <p>My daughter needed to complete a school photography assignment, so I took her to a local university for some subject matter. I took this while she was snapping off two rolls of B&W film.</p><div>00WUfy-245267584.thumb.jpg.9edc86d35c9f68b9e3de0ea9dfe6839e.jpg</div>
  7. <p>This was taken at the Butterfly Conservatory in Niagara Falls, Ontario. I received the Nikon R1 Speedlight Flash System only a few days prior, and the results were very satisfying. The trick to shooting butterflies in the conservatory are a.) watch where you step (the butterflies land everywhere), and b.) patience - find a spot and hope one lands near where you are set up for shooting.</p><div>00WS2u-243737584.jpg.e28311d04ee77ed4b03489fcd7488a16.jpg</div>
×
×
  • Create New...