jschweigl

March 31, 2003

<center>Don't know those people, but it was a cool party</center><div>

004qBY-12114584.jpg.86d5542f7f58b20018d80820c8815c3a.jpg

</div>

March 31, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?

photo_id=1397341"> M6, Summicron 2/50, T400CN</center>

March 31, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1397374"> M6, Summicron 2/50, T400CN</center>

March 29, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1392651"> cold enough that no one would sit outside M6, Noct @ f1, T400CN</center>

March 27, 2003

Same experience here. I switched to T400CN because of ease of use and the ability to scan with ICE enabled (I'm having serious dust problems). Shot at ISO 320 I'm very pleased with the missing "grain" and overall appearance, but printed on the inkjet I don't see any sharp edges as I do with Delta 400 or Tri-X. Excessive unsharp masking is no solution either. It's perfect for web display, however.

March 26, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1386885&size=lg"> placed on the scanner glass, please don't critique ;-)</center>

March 22, 2003

Johann Schweigl, Austria, amateur, starting to suffer from gearhed syndrome.

March 22, 2003

Saw a black .72 MP today in a shop in Vienna. EUR 3100 ...

Posted March 20, 2003 · March 20, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1375496&size=lg"> M3, Summarit 1.5/50 wide open, Tri-X @ 320, 4000 dpi scan unsharpened, curves slightly adjusted.</center>Really nice lens, especially for portraits. The picture above was taken in dim light at f1.5 and 1/30 freehanded, with strong backlighting from the bar.

March 20, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1244489"> sorry, no Leica</center>

March 19, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1373306"> Approaching gasoline station, M6 with VC 15mm held out of car window</center>

March 18, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1371542"> took a zenit 3m, left three leicas.</center>

March 18, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1371503"> stopping time</center>

March 17, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1369331&size=lg"> M7, Summicron 2/35 Asph at f2, T400CN</center>

March 17, 2003

Thanks to all, I'm relieved now. I simply haven't seen this phenomenon in all its glory before as I always shot in available darkness. Think I'll keep using the noct at f1 what it is designed for. Stopped down a little, I do like the corner falloff somehow. I posted a picture in the "No words: walking" thread that must have been shot at f1.4 or 2.@manu: yep, my Holga does pretty the same and I really love it for that <center><a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/1212832&size=md"><img border="0" src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1212832&size=sm"></a></center>

March 17, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1368497"> Vienna</center>

March 16, 2003

Hm ... checked Tony Rowletts page too, could it be that the images are cropped? Mimi II, Eric II and Andy show pretty the same symptoms, maybe not as strong, but noticeable enough.

March 16, 2003

I had no real reason to use it during daylight, just was curious to see how it looks. And I wanted to get that PAN F+ out of the camera. No filters, but I used the builtin lens hood. Seems it will get a trip to Leica.

March 16, 2003

I've used the noct for the first time at daylight and have consistent

vignetting on all the frames I shot at f 1. I attached an example

picture. I've read about vignetting here but never saw it actually.

Quite strong. Is this normal or has my noct got a problem?

March 15, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1365429"> M6, Jupiter 3, T400CN</center>

March 15, 2003

Thanks for all the info. I was afraid someone would bring up the "one of each" idea ;-) I'm bidding on a DR and thought I'd possibly sell my cron because I like the shorter minimum distance of the DR. Well, think I won't sell it. Seems I've turned into kind of a 50mm freak because I already have a summarit, current elmarit, cron, noct, jupiter 3 and jupiter 8. That brings up the idea of a big shootout to compare the lenses at several f-stops. Would that be of interest?

March 15, 2003

Is a Summicron DR as good as a plain Summicron, serial number 3506364

at the usual distances? I'm thinking about getting a DR and selling

my current lens if I wouldn't lose any quality.

March 14, 2003

Matt, i replaced the above image with the rotated one. If it doesn't show up it's still in your cache and you need to reload.

March 14, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?

photo_id=1363153"> M7, Summicron 2/35 Asph,

T400CN</center>

March 14, 2003

<center><img src="http://www.photo.net/photodb/image-display?photo_id=1363165"> cropped</center>

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Store

Posts posted by jschweigl