chris_williams19
-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by chris_williams19
-
-
Hi John,
Yes, I did some poking around the interwebs before I posted and didn't find any solutions but also didn't find particular recent posts either. I was hoping someone may have come up with something new; perhaps wishful thinking.
Hi Tom,
Yes, indeed it is the Stylus Epic Zoom 80. I bought it new but hadn't used it for at 10-15 years and noticed it had this intermittent problem of light leaks. Then with this last roll I was trying to use some kind of scientific method to figure out if there was a pattern to the seemingly random light leaks that appear and then not.
I'll definitely try to give it a gentle clean but maybe it's just one of those thing that if I am going to use, know that I'll have light leaks in at least some of the photos. It'll be like a higher end Holga. :)
-
Heya,
I shot this roll specifically at 35mm only because i wanted to see if zooming was causing the issue. I'll see about taking a brush to the barrel to see if that knocks any dirt or grit loose.
Thanks!
-
Hi m42dave,
Yes, on this camera you slide open the lens cover and the lens comes out of the body a little. I also zoomed out lens (it's a 35-80 zoom), pop the battery out, then open up the back and take a flashlight to the front and nothing seems to get through, at least obviously.
I don't see anything that looks like felt or fabric inside of this lens barrel either. Though if there is supposed to be, that could be the cause of my problem.
Thanks!
-
Hello all,
First of all, thank you for taking the time to read this thread and adding your thoughts. I have a Olympus Stylus Epic that I like using when I would be a bit fearful of using a full-fledged SLR camera, like sea kayaking or rock climbing. I have noticed that occasionally, say 5-6 times in a roll of 36, there appears to be a light leak on the film. I have taped off the film viewport on the back and it still happens. I assume it must becoming from the lens or barrel based on the shape and the fact that the light stops at the film edge. I have taken a flashlight to the front and can't find anything obvious.
So I have two questions:
- Can someone confirm (or deny) that this leak from the front lens or barrel?
- If so, as I assume no one is servicing these cameras any more, can someone offer some guidance on how to fix this issue?
Thank you very much for your time!
(Note: the photo is oriented as to how I believe it would be in the camera.)
- Can someone confirm (or deny) that this leak from the front lens or barrel?
-
I would say nearly exclusively. I grew up shooting transparencies and just don't care much for negatives. Not saying they are better or worse, just that I am familiar with and used to transparencies to prefer them. I bought a lot of Ektachrome E100VS after the announcement Kodak was discontinuing the film and kept it in my freezer ever since. I've got about 80-90 rolls left and plan on shooting them until I run out. I am hoping Kodak Alaris sticks with their plan to release another Ektachrome (and fingers crossed, it's akin to the old VS) so that I can continue my E6 habit well into the future. I am also very lucky to have an amazing lab here in Denver to process my E6 film at a VERY reasonable price ($8.95 USD per roll with mounting) and they still have enough business to do 1-2 runs a day.
-
-
<p>Finally gotten the opportunity to take the Contax IIa off the shelf again and wander about town. I wanted to see how the Nikkor 28/3.5 works on the Contax and despite the differences in the helical, I am happy to say that it appears to work for me. Though I didn't shoot anything that was both close up and with the aperture wide open where I am sure some focusing issues will pop up.</p><div></div>
-
-
<p>I've been trying to get out more to shoot but a silly thing called work keeps getting in the way. Still coming to terms with the Contax IIa, but slowly getting my brain wrapped around it. This is from a roll I shot with it using Rollei Retro 400S with a post-war Biogon 35mm lens.</p>
-
-
<p>Paul,<br>
I have been quite happy with Rollei IR 400 for high contrast results and having it processed by dr5. <br>
<a href="/photo/9953831">(example)</a></p>
-
<p>Well, I for one only shoot only slide film, whether it's color or black and white. I am strictly an amateur when it comes to shooting but I've been shooting film for nearly 4 decades. I guess I use it not because it's better (or not) from other mediums, but rather because it's what I know and I like the consistency. I have slides from my earliest pictures to my last trip 3 months ago. I work in computers for my day job and the idea of spending more time in front of the computer for my hobby doesn't appeal to me. Someday, I might be forced to work only with digital for my photography but until that time, I have some great manual cameras that I enjoy and slide film is what I'll continue to shoot. Your mileage may vary and past results are not indicative of future returns, but hey, it's fun for me.</p>
<p>As far as dr5, I am a regular user of his services for B&W slide work (it helps they're here in Denver and I can drive to drop off and pick up my film). David, who runs the place, can be a bit rough around the edges but I have always gotten great results from his work.</p>
<p>Finally in terms of 35mm color slide film availability, the only folks that are making it these days are Fuji & Rollei/Agfa. Or if you're like me, you have a freezer full of Ektachrome. (-:</p>
-
<p>I ran across <a href="http://phys.org/news/2014-01-sole-camera-nasa-moon-missions.html">this article</a> from Phys.org and thought the classic camera enthusiasts here would find interesting, though I suspect the camera might be a bit price prohibitive.</p>
-
<p>Having just returned from that very region, I would take the weather into consideration. It was very rainy when I was there and when it wasn't rainy, it was humid. I found the humidity made long telephoto shots not as crisp as I would have liked them.<br>
I was shooting 35mm film and I found the 35mm-105mm range was the sweet spot given the conditions and the scenery. <br>
Your mileage may vary.</p>
-
<p>More fantastic shots from a classic camera and lens combination, <strong>Rick</strong>! As <strong>Starvy</strong> mentioned, I too would be interested in seeing what some Velvia would do for the contrast of this lens.<br>
Keep up the great work!</p>
-
<blockquote>
<p><em>What can only (your) photography do?</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p> Remind me of the people I have met and the places I have been.</p>
-
<p>Have a freezer stuffed with Kodak E100VS which I'll shoot until I can't find anymore. Then it'll be Velvia 100 probably. Also have a fair bit of Rollei IR and some Ilford HP5.</p>
-
<p><em>"Minty"</em> is a bit like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord">fnord</a> to me. I see it but I don't see it. I would be more frightened if <em>"Minty"</em> was replaced with "<em>Minty-fresh <a href="00am6c">Smena</a>"</em>.</p>
-
<p>I will second <strong>Tony's</strong> comment. If it's anything like my Contax IIa, the knurled grip ring is quite likely to damage your fingernail. Gorgeous camera, but be careful when resetting the frame counter!<br>
Be sure to post some pictures from your Contax IIIa, <strong>Santiago</strong>!</p>
-
<p>I heard this story the other day about the found photos of Charles W. Cushman on NPR and found it fascinating. And after seeing the photos myself, I am even more enthralled and I wanted to share with the greater Photo.net community.<br>
It's basically about a guy who bought his first roll of colour film in 1938 and then nearly obsessively shot colour pictures for the next 30 years.<br>
<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/pictureshow/2012/09/14/161016597/found-photos-the-1930s-in-full-color">CLICK</a> <br /> <a href="http://www.npr.org/news/specials/2012/cushman/">CLICK</a></p>
-
<p>Great shots, <strong>Rick</strong>! I love the family picture of all of the Uniomats but the lighting in the Magnolias is just amazing. It really has a feel of a shot taken in the 60s or 70s.<br>
I must admit that with every post you start here, I am reminded of the Jack Nicholson line from Batman, "where does he get those wonderful toys." <br>
Thanks again for sharing!</p>
-
<blockquote>
<p>Yes, life is a desire and right now I desire meaning. Can I achieve that with my camera?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let me put it this way... for more years than I care to think about, I've worked in computers. I had a difficult time explaining to my friends and family what I did for a living, much less my bosses. I find that with photography, I have (with film at least) something tactile, something to show people... I made this.<br /> And while I didn't create the environment or the landscape or the people or even the situation -- I captured the moment. And to me, that's something.</p>
-
<p>There's something about the red bellows and the gorgeous wood grain... takes my breath away. A beautiful work of art.<br>
Now... where are the pictures from that lovely camera? :)</p>
-
<p>These are fantastic, <strong>Chris</strong>. Are these in anyway related to your previous post? (<a href="../classic-cameras-forum/00alhF">link</a>)<br /> If so, I think you have some pictures that are of historical value. Amazing... Thanks for posting!</p>
Olympus Stylus Epic Light Leak from... ?
in Olympus
Posted
Hi Tom,
The example I have uploaded for this post from my "test" roll, was the worst of the 6 shots that had light leaks and I could probably salvage the others by cropping and whatnot. And I since the Stylus Epic has never been nor ever will be my primary shooter, I don't mind having a bit of a crap shoot for when I am using it; aside from the usual 36 chances per roll. I have my F2's for what I would consider my normal everyday cameras and wanted to bring the Olympus out of retirement for those times as mentioned above when I would be concerned about damaging the F2's.
Again, thanks for everyone's thoughts. And who knows, maybe someone will find the magic formula to solving the light leaks!