carl_sanders_photography

<p>Please do and what was the name of the adapter? thanks Carl</p>

<p>David Henderson: We were waiting for this contribution to point it out David.</p>

<p>Lawrence Rockford : "All the gear, no idea!". On a positive note I changed this to "All the gear with no fear" after building up much equipment to tackle any assignment. May be useful to know that flatbed scanners like the Epsom Pro V750 (£500 approx) will give excellent results into digital medium, from the transparencies, if needed. Pleased to see that film and the best camera of all time, are still being progressed, best wishes,</p>

<p>But some (or many) do not. No one said they were. Choice of subject, composition and use of light can be taught without the use of a camera, though this is detracting from the original thread and the parameters of the enquiry.</p>

<p>Au contrare Jean-Yves! The basics of photography can not always be achieved with a point and shoot, not all of these cameras display the settings of the lens aperture, shutter speeds and ISO / ASA speed at a glance, like a film camera does. Nice lens by the way, best wishes, </p>

<p>Even the later ones! Personal choice, we still use film and scan along with DSLR use when ever appropriate. We also use an Olympus Om1n and Om2n for the fun of it, the Epson V750 scanner gives excellent results with film, all the best,</p>

<p>Hasselblad looks the sensible option, the quality, build and size leaves the other medium format cameras standing. <br>

We have used all medium format cameras either assisting or photographing in London, the RB7 is heavy bulky and requires two actions to wind on (big deal!) the RB being a very popular camera but not as well proportioned as the Hasselblad. The Hasselblad is small, quick to use, uses similar shaped and size digital / film backs. Full compliment of lenses and accessories available, a complete system, that should be relatively cheap to obtain. It has a cult like following and there is a reason for that. (We have been using them for the past 30 odd years)<br>

Whilst some professional photographers are off loading their V camera systems the wise ones are keeping theirs. Used good Digital backs can be bought for around £2,000 or less and the prices are tumbling due to competition and the market, especially for studio work.<br>

Tests, whilst at college, on the difference between 6 x7 format and the 6 x 6 format with Zeiss lenses demonstrated, that the format size alone does not necessarily mean sharper or better quality pictures. The quality of the Zeiss lenses more than makes up for any 6x7 format or crop.<br>

The Hasselblad, contrary to previous, sits comfortably in the hand and is well balanced, never had a problem with it being awkward as suggested, though it is starting to get heavier as age takes its toll. It is a neat little piece of engineering, the 500/CM also has a pistol grip accessories and the later 503CW a motorised hand grip. (More weight though)<br>

The choice will also depend on personal taste, Hasselblad is a classic and iconic camera, it is a joy to own, it could sit in the studio on the desk all day and still earn its keep by doing nothing but sitting pretty. Of course the world moves on and each will recommend their own.<br>

Digial Slr's come into their own as mentioned and it is a matter of choice, pratical use and what the camera is to be used for. We use a Nikon D3100 for holiday snaps, neat little camera, just the job!<br>

enjoy the course : )</p>

<p>Just beautiful aren't they and with digital backs on their way down in price there is the option of of film and digital. Great purchase that will last a life time.</p>

<p>Hi there T, the Flash Centre only do Elinchrom, but the other info is useful. Did phone Bowens UK who informed some tubes may be different and still await reply as only just sent them pictures like these here, thanks and best wishes, </p>

<p>Hi there, does anyone know how to replace a tube for the above, it is the grey head. Is is just a matter of unscrewing the brass screw and loosening off the wire from the metal support? Or does the brass screw keep the base attached and we need to just pull the tube away from its two fittings and release the wire? Anyone fix these in London? thanks</p><div></div>

<p>Thanks John, (robison) will take a look at the website. Noted that Camtech USA would like to get the OM1n reproduced. We have been trying in the UK to get them to re release the body design as a digital camera (Like the Leica M9 etc) but would be just as happy to purchase a new OM1n film camera. Film/ flatbed scanners are improving in spec and coming down in price so it makes sense to still use film and scan. Thanks for the comments.</p>

<p>Where abouts is Camtech? thanks</p>

<p>Dear Jean-Yves Mead, how kind, this would be of very much interest, thanks, : )</p>

<p>John Ribison: Hi there, is this camtech in UK? No scares, it was intended to get the body fully serviced at Olympus Luton, UK, we like to take care of our equipment and this was bought knowing the shortcomings at this age. It is working fine but for the lens aperture diaphragm being slow to return on a manual depth of field check, again expected. The lens has quite a few dust specs ( normal ) and we are looking for a 55mm or 50mm 1.4 replacement. Thanks</p>

<p>Hi Jim, this has already been done, hence the question to the forum, thanks</p><div></div>

<p>Hi there, we have just purchased an OM1n in mint condition which we are delighted with. We recognise that there is a need to find a replacement battery eventually, presently a HD 625. There is argument that an existing 1.5v battery will suffice with an adjustment by one click to the film speed knob. An argument to use alkaline which diminishes over time down to 1.35 volts with exposure errors no different to some brand new camera exposure inaccuracies. Use of an external meter to compensate settings was also an option.</p>

<p>Whilst an old chestnut, ideas and thoughts much appreciated, </p>

<p>Apologies if this is not the correct section but the camera is considered a classic, best wishes</p>

<p>Carl</p>

<p>Hi there James, how fabulous, used a couple of these for off shore work rather than Nikons because they were so light and nimble to use. Excellent design apart from robustness, tended to end their life if dropped. I was on the look out for one to play with and get back into film for the fun of it, where abouts did you come across this one? Looks in excellent condition, wish Olympus would bring out a digital version of it, best wishes : D</p>

<p>Ooops! sent in error!</p>

<p>Thanks we used a Bahco hacksaw, 145kg tension with 24tpi (standard purchase), no expert but it gave clean cut, moved tube round instead of cutting across, finished with metal file and sandpaper. The whole item was striped, cleaned, refurbished and looks like new. Whole stand is simply engineered so pleasure to progress. Any one else thinking of doing this only too happy to help, best wishes, </p>

<p>Hi there, we are purchasing a used one on the basis that someone along the way informed that these can be cut down in height, the purchase is less than a 2 series Gitzo tripod. Has anyone done this or know of anyone who has? Was it relatively easy to do, it is appreciated that no likes doing this but it will not fit in the studio otherwise.<br>

Any advice much sort after and appreciated.<br>

best wishes, <br>

Carl </p>

<p>We used fill in flash to keep the sharpness, always hand held, we never had problems with this camera. They were standard issue for the British forces, just need to practice and realise limitations if any, on any camera. All the best</p>