laurentah

<p>I really do recommend to read all the posts of this forum. I dont know exactly how you make you pictures (need of sharpness or color truth - things and so on) but as far as I know, i don't think that bit' things or mega pixel-things are truly a point (above say 16mg, to be honest). However, I guess that there still is a bread of photographers who do not think about that kind of stupidities. the end result is the thing. The client pays. that's all. whether it's 12 or 16 b ? real full frame or not ? truly xxxxx like thing ? so ? is your client satisfied or not ?<br> There is a real difference between guessing a "cliché" and realizing a photography of someone or something.<br> That's the price.<br> use films as well as polaroids (meaning nowadays fuji - shame, even of quality - to be the only one 4 backs) and a CFV if you can afford.<br> hasselblad is meant to serve hasselblad. all said. <br> why a cfv ? because it's just designed for it. you don't care the accuracy of a "true focus" , you got eyes to see. never, ever, will someone say something about it. you just don't need to use it above 100 ISO, so go for a CFV (all other posts said). The True choice would be a CFV 16 and above ( CFV 16 II , CFV 39 , CFV 50 ) ; my taste ( compared with other brands) . Try one, and you'll be surprised. even compared with the last " brand new marketed DSLR". ( shame that Hassy is taking that kind of direction ).<br> Whatever the case: wether, you choose to go fully digital and then a brand new DLSR or Hassy would be best / or you choose to let a part of romance in your point of view n go for a cfv. try. you'll know. <br> Expressing a point a view or searching 4 perfect accuracy ? that's what all photography is all about. </p>