michael_edelman3
-
Posts
56 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by michael_edelman3
-
-
An interesting scene, but the effect is not so much fog as it is just a general washed out grey. You might try shooting this scene again on an overcast, but less foggy, day. -
Nice composition, but the colors are weak, there's no detail and the overall image is soft.
-
Normally one tries to abvoid cutting a picture in half with the horizon, but this works. -
Marvelous composition. Either you spent a long time waiting, or the gorillas have SAG/AFTRA cards.... -
Great composition. You don't often seen a photo with that much white space that works so well.
-
It's exceptionally hard to make a photo with this much contrast between shade and light and have it come out this well. Nicely done.
-
Almost cloyingly cute but I still like it. Excellent composition and the photographer knows you have to get down on the ground if you want to photograph kids and animals! -
A very strong photojournalistic image. -
The photo should have been shot much closer, to concentrate more on the geyser, or from much farther, to show the geyser in its setting. Shooting at a much higher shutter speed to freeze it would help; so would using a much slower speed, to make it more abstract. The problem is that the spray from the geyser obscures much of the background, but the geyser itself is too indistinct to be an interesting subject. This is a good example of where the photographer sees an intersting subject but doesn't fully consider the difference between how film and the eye see a subject. -
Definitely different. -
A very good nature shot. -
Nice hand-tinted effect, but too much of the digital manipulation is visible. This could use some hand editing to "humanize" the textures on the buildings.
-
Nice posterization sort of effect. Very 1970s/Pop Art.
-
Great expression. Fine candid.
-
A good candid. Very Eugene Smith/ Life magazine. I'd like to see more details in the shadow, particularly in the subject's face. -
A good example of where digital falls down compared tofilm. This photo really cries out for exceptional resolution and tonal gradation. You want to see the individual hairs and the division between the beard and the sweater- but it's too muddy. A good idea let down by technical limitations.
-
A cute idea with a lot of humor. -
There's not really much here.
-
Nice textures, but too muddy. You need a wider range of tones. -
The photo is mostly out of focus. When you're dealing with a small detailed object, that's a fatal flaw unless you're trying for some specific effect.
-
There's a lot of character and expression in the subject's face, but it's lost in the expanse of the picture. The jacket, which isn't particularly interesting, competes with the face for the attention of the viewer. There's not much else going on there. The background- which occupies a large portion of the photo- is blurred and indistinct. There's not enough contrast and there aren't any strong elements other than the face to hold the viewer's interest. -
A good candid. The hands and the stick have a lot of character. Consider cropping on top and right to center the hands a bit more and remove some of the white shirt that intrudes on the right. -
A fine candid.
-
I love B&W night shots and this one strikes me as particularly well composed and executed.
Irma2
in Uncategorized
Posted