Jump to content

alan_w1

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by alan_w1

  1. <p>Will swap my M8 for the M9 as soon as I can. But fear Guido is correct- there will be no market for used M8s at all.... Hope Leica offers some kind of trade-in program<br>

    By the way, the brochure reminds me of an old advert for peri-peri chicken: <a href="

    Enjoy!</p>
  2. <p>With prices on used MF digital equipment falling dramatically I am considering making a purchase. Any suggestions on a site similar to this one with lots of users posting their questions and sharing experiences? I'd like to learn as much as possible before reaching for my wallet.<br>

    <br />Also, a suggestion to this site's managers/owners: how about a seperate category for medium format digital? I'm sure it would be a welcome additional to your already great site.<br>

    <br />Thx</p>

  3. <p>I am intrigued by how a camera like the Alpa TC works with a digital back. Am I right in assuming that the camera itself doesn't have any light meter? Or split image focusing thingy like a view finder camera? So how does the user set these things? Or does the digital back have some tricks up its sleeve? And how does this work in comparison to the same back on a Hasselblad H3D for example?<br>

    Any input appreciated!<br>

    Thanks in advance.</p>

  4. <p>Help! (And sorry for the silly question)<br>

    I had to reinstall everything on my Mac including Photoshop (am using CS3) and for some reason I can't get it to see the printer drivers for my Epson 2400, or for Quadtone RIP. I redownloaded and re-installed both of these drivers, but Photoshop just won't see them.<br>

    <br />Any suggestions would be very welcome!</p>

    <p>Thanks<br>

    <br />Alan</p>

  5. I have a Mamiya 7ii which I really like.

    Pros:

    -easy to use

    -easy to carry- much lighter than most of the other cameras mentioned here

    -reasonable built-in lightmeter

    -reasonably sharp (although there are sharper cameras out there)

     

    Cons:

    -expensive

    -i prefer 6x9 to 6x7

    -don't think it is terribly robust- mightn't survive a fall for example

  6. I have both a M6 and a Mamiya 7ii. The Mamiya takes better pics overall. I'm sure the Leica glass is better but the larger negative size (almost 5x the size I think) more than compensates. In fact I am thinking of archiving the M6- it is close to mint and I'm sure 50 years from now will be a real collector's item- it is beautiful and a joy to handle and use. The Mamiya is great too but it's a lump of plastic with little nostalgic value......

     

    If only Leica made a M6 for 120 film.....

     

    For me the biggest bottleneck is however the scanner. I have an Epson 750 but after trying a friend's Nikon 9000 wish I had bought that instead....

  7. An interesting topic. I use an Epson 750. It's ok for MF but not so good for 35mm I find. I tried a friend's Nikon 9000 for MF and it was hands down better. Personally I'd love to get one, but am a little put off by the fact that it can't do 4x5. Although I've never shot 4x5 I have the urge to do so, and would like a 4x5 scanner too. Some people recommended the Imacon 949 but I can't find a second hand one at a reasonable price although I've looked for ages. A new Flextight X1 is nice too but is ridiculously priced for a hobbyiest, esp seeing as film is becoming more and more of a specialist format. (Before anyone shoots me, I love film and am not saying its dead.)

     

    If I hadn't bought the Epson, I'd probably get the Nikon today and forget my LF dreams for now

  8. Very helpful. Thank you everyone. I hadn't considered the Sinar but will look at that too.

     

    A final question: will the Leica be future-proof without a changable back? Or will it be so good that the future will take 20 years to arrive? And is it a mistake to buy a Hassy back that has a smaller sized sensor than what appears to be the "new standard size" on their latest backs?

     

    Once again, thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...