paul_hunter3

Watch out everyone, cross Lex and he'll try to ruin your life, permanently, over it.

All I did on photo.net was I was mean to a couple of people. Whoo Hoo! I have got nothing to lose. Go ahead, make it public Lex.

 

I think I'll write an editorial to the newspaper with some of that photo-journalism I learned. Headline will read, "Photo.net openly tells its paying subscribers to STFU." Below it, it will read, "don't believe me? just go to the website, you'll see a, "STFU," right on it."

 

Go ahead, lets do this

You don't address your own bad behavior and you forget one very important thing, in the "Film Vs. Digital,"

posting of mine, I didn't actually do anything wrong ! Did I !?

I'll say, "look students, photo.net is so professional they tell their paying subscribers to STFU."

I start a war if you want. I have my own websites. I will tell the world exactly how photo.net operates. I will start on APUG. I am a photography teacher. I don't have to tell my students anything, I will simply show them what happened. Lex, your behavior will be shown to the world, to both the internet and my classes.

Oh I forgot, you're the big, bad Lex, no one is to question you nor do you have to justify your behavior.

How does any of this excuse your behavior? You did not address a single thing I said.

I have never been banned in my entire life at photo.net, but I suppose Lex has a monopoly on the truth. Never once have I had trouble accessing any account.

 

I am not all those people Lex says I am. That is Slander.

 

One last thing: How does any of this excuse your behavior?

Retaliatory remarks. I wouldn't expect anymore from Lex

I can't believe photo.net would allow a person like Lex to have any sort of power here and are are three examples

why:

 

1.) "STFU" locktite applied. (Lex action)

 

STFU = Shut the F*ck Up. So he is telling photo.net paying subscribers to Shut the F*ck up. That is

inappropriate behavior.

 

2.) "I don't have time to babysit" (Lex qoute) So basically he is communicating that paying photo.net subscibers

are children who need to be babysay. That is condescending.

 

3.) Telling paying subscribers what they can and can't talk about. (Lex Action) I am confused, is Photo.net

forums here for its paying subscribers or is it here for the moderators and their whims? People obviously like

talking about film vs. digital, and if a good number of them are paying subscribers I think they should have that

choice.

 

I was a paying subscriber. I even bought a gift subscription for some stranger. These three reasons are why I

am no longer a paying subscriber. Shame, I only got through one month of my subscription. I no longer have a

place to share photographs like these telling other photographers about film, filter, and development combinations.

 

Sincerely

 

JM (Name withheld at user's request, 12/19/08 - LJ)