walter_strong5

March 19, 2010

This image shows a bit of pathos.

March 19, 2010

Very nice rim lighting.

March 19, 2010

Nothing special about this image.

March 19, 2010

Water drops on leaves have been heavily over photographed in the last 30 years.

March 19, 2010

I cannot imagine for the life of me why you presented this image in this venue. It just flat does not stand up to your previous images.

March 19, 2010

Photos of roses with water on them are a dime a dozen but this one has very intense color and the dark background is a big plus.

March 19, 2010

I think it would benefit from more DOF. Were you using a tripod?

March 19, 2010

Great view of the cicada but I'd've cropped off the bottom half of that image.

March 19, 2010

I've never seen a praying mantis that looked SO MUCH like a space alien! Great macro work.

March 19, 2010

I've tried my hand at macro photography and I'm here to tell you this is top notch work.

March 9, 2010

I love the tone range. The crop is just right. It manages to have a classical look and yet is contemporary at the same time. I just love good portrait work.

November 18, 2009

"It looks beautiful but when I enlarged this image and the centre came more clear to me , I found this is a compenation of two different images, the sky is not related to the forground and even there is a line of seperation is very clear and can easly been seen with naked eye, this line is the effect of photo shop joining two different images of two different exposures."

This is what disturbs me about photography today. When is enough enough, and why can't people just be right up front with what they've done to an image? I could go to my grave a happy man if I could just produce ONE outstanding image that didn't need to be worked over in a photo editing program.