nicole_weingart

<p>Thank you all so much for such great info! Really I am floored by all the in depth responses. You helped me so very much.<br> I heard from my editor that a main still photog for one of the major networks just switched from using a Jacobson blimp to a mirrorless camera, although the lag would ruin what I shoot (lots of reality tv, so unscripted and unpredictable.) I am going to find out in a week which camera she bought and look into that as well but for now with a lag, that does not work for what I am shooting.<br> I am using the blimp so sound is not an issue, but I love the idea of ditching the huge box blimp. <br> I am also not paid for retouching or post work and have a very quick turn around, so for me the more I can get in camera while shooting with less post is also a plus (thus downsizing from the D810).<br> Ellis, your testing is exactly what I needed, thank you!<br> Seems like the census from everyone is that I should do the D4s then for the iso low light and since I am not printing anything (if they run anything it is in 8.5 x 11 mags, nothing large)<br> maybe someday in the near future get the D810 to use for portraits and stuff and as a backup camera (instead of my D3)....<br> thanks again,<br> Nicole</p>

<p>I have read all the reviews for the D810, seems great except for high iso, but I can't seem to tell at what iso the difference comes into play. I am wondering if anyone has shot stills with it like I plan to?<br> Depending on the tv show, I am often shooting low light, average 3200 iso, at night 4x times that, usually with movement.<br> deciding btwn D810 or D4s<br> the iso benefit when I upgraded from the D3s to the D4s (currently renting) was phenomenal difference, wondering if the D810 is a downgrade in quality?<br> thanks!!</p>