<p>Hi all. I'm curious if anyone has some ideas about the best way to troubleshoot exposure issues with an EOS-1 (original model, film body). I pulled mine out of storage recently (you may have seen my other recent post about the rear dial being flaky). I ran a roll of slide film through it, and simultaneously ran a roll through an old Nikon I'd also pulled out. I shot the same photos on each camera, frame by frame. I shot in manual exposure mode with spot metering. All outdoors, with no flash. Nothing fancy. I wasn't <strong>super </strong>careful with my metering (and I'm probably a bit rusty), but I also wasn't completely haphazard.</p> <p>The Nikon roll came back fine. Some shots were a bit under or over exposed, but in general it looked good. On the Canon roll, about 75% of the frames are completely black. Not just underexposed, but unexposed (or so underexposed that literally nothing is visible). It was intermittent throughout the roll, so it's not as if it just stopped working at some point (or stopped advancing the film or something like that).</p> <p>Off the top of my head, I can think of these possibilities:</p> <ol> <li>The shutter isn't firing, or is open for much less time than it should be.</li> <li>The mirror isn't getting out of the way.</li> <li>The aperture is closing all the way down even when it shouldn't be.</li> <li>The metering is completely off, leading me to choose incorrect exposures.</li> <li>The DX code on the film was read incorrectly, leading me to choose incorrect exposures.</li> </ol> <p>I fired off a bunch of shots with the back open, and the shutter and mirror visually appear to be operating properly. Obviously I can't tell if the shutter speed is correct, but I can tell that it gets faster and slower as I adjust the setting. And the long exposure times (the ones I can count off in my head) seem about right.</p> <p>Similarly, I fired a bunch of shots staring at the lens, and the aperture seems to be closing the right amount for whatever setting I put it on (again, visually, it changes proportionally with the setting).</p> <p>It's somewhat possible the metering is off. As I was shooting with the two cameras, I wasn't really closely comparing the exposures they came up with. But if it was way off, I thought I would have noticed. Maybe not (sad how reliant I've gotten on instant feedback with digital). However, I walked around now with that camera and a DSLR which has a known good meter, and they consistently came up with the same exposures (or close enough).</p> <p>I put a few empty rolls in the camera, and the DX codes were all read properly.</p> <p>So, I'm kind of stumped. It's possible there's an intermittent problem of some sort. Or maybe one of the things I visually inspected doesn't actually work as well as it looks like it does. Or something different happens when the back is shut. Maybe whatever is causing the rear dial to work intermittently is causing this problem too. But I'm not really sure how to efficiently move forward to narrow it down at this point. It's going to quickly get expensive and time consuming to keep running rolls of film through to test it. Maybe it's time to just go hunting on eBay for a "new" one :-p</p> <p>Any suggestions? Have any of you seen a similar problem with this body?</p>