Jump to content

j._patric_dahl_n

Members
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by j._patric_dahl_n

  1. ...and the pre war Rolleiflex Standard takes 28,5mm push on filters. The original Rolleiflex takes 24mm push ons. :-)

     

    On the bayonet filters (Rolleifilters) it says R I, R II or R III, and that stands for the bayonet sizes.

  2. It's true that artists choose their equipmets to get the _feeling_ that they want. The Voigtländer Heliar isn't sharper than the Zeiss Tessar, but have other qualities like a smooth bokéh and a slight softness. Zeiss Triotar aren't as sharp as the Tessar or Planar, but sometimes this lens is very useful when you want a sharp picture with soft corners. It's like when artist painters use "their" special brushes instead of the cheaper ones told to have the same quality, or more highly regarded ones. However, one has to be rich to try all the cameras and lenses available on the market. :)
  3. I got the news that the extremely fine grained Efke 25 film now is

    available in Sheet Film! It's only sold under the German name Wephota

    NP 25 by http://banse-grohmann.de/wephota/sortimix.htm

     

    Agfa APX 25 disapered in Sheet Film, and after that compleatly from

    the market. Wephota NP 25 will fill in needs for an extremely fine

    grained film in larger sizes.

     

    At the moment, Wephota is building their homepage, and will update

    the information in the near future. Bookmark their page!

     

    They also sells Glass Plates, but I don't know in what emulsions they

    come. But it sure is interesting!

     

    /Patric

     

    (If my email address that shows is jenspatric@mail.bip.net, it

    doesn't work anymore. Got to change that to

    jenspatricdahlen@hotmail.com)

  4. I have used the Rolleinar close-up lenses with Rollei TLR's with the Tessar, Xenar, Planar and Xenotar, and as Andrew, used smaller apertures for maximal sharpness due to the limited depth of field, and have't noticed any differences between the results. These lenses are excellent.

     

    I have also used the Rolleinars, and the Zeiss Proxar lenses (plus the Rolleiparkeil parallax corrector) on Rolleicords with Triotar. Works great here too, but the lenses mentioned above are better.

  5. I love Efke films! R25, R50 and R100. Extremely fine grain and the

    conversion of colors into greyscale is great. The slow speed films

    are ortopan-chromatic. R100 has a little larger grain than APX100 and

    Plus-X, but I like it. It's hard to go wrong with R100, it's so

    forgiving. Much more so than the APX and PXP.

  6. Brown Tone Paper Developer Agfa 120

     

    <p>

     

    Stock Solution

     

    <p>

     

    Warm Water (125 F or 52 C) - 750.0 ml

     

    <p>

     

    Sodium Sulfite, desiccated - 60.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Hydroquinone - 24.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Potassium Carbonate - 80.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Add cold water to make - 1.0 liter

     

    <p>

     

    This developer will produce a variety of brown to warm black tones on

    various papers depending on dilution and exposure time. The following

    table lists the dilution and exposure for various tones on Agfa

    papers.

     

    <p>

     

     

    Development Conditions for Agfa Developer 120

    Development

    Paper Type: Brovira

    Image Tone: warm black

    Exposure Time: normal*

    Dilution: 1:5

    Development time @ 68 deg F (20 C): 4-5 minutes

    Paper Type: Portriga Rapid

    Image Tone: brown-black

    Exposure Time: 1 « x longer than normal*

    Dilution: 1:4

    Development time @ 68 deg F (20 C): 3 minutes

     

    <p>

     

    *By normal exposure is to be understood the exposure required to

    produce the best possible print when developed for 1 « minutes in

    Agfa 100.

     

    <p>

     

     

     

    <p>

     

    Brown Tone Paper Developer Agfa 123

    For Portrait Paper

    Stock Solution

     

    <p>

     

    Warm Water (125 F or 52 C) - 750.0 ml

     

    <p>

     

    Sodium Sulfite, desiccated - 60.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Hydroquinone - 24.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Potassium Carbonate - 80.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Potassium Bromide - 25.0 grams

     

    <p>

     

    Add cold water to make - 1.0 liter

     

    <p>

     

    This developer produces tones ranging from brown black to olive brown

    on Portriga Rapid paper depending on dilution and exposure. The table

    below gives the typical development conditions for the various tones.

     

    <p>

     

    Development Conditions for Agfa Developer 123

    Paper Type: Portriga Rapid

    Image Tone: brown-black

    Exposure Time: 2 « x longer than normal*

    Dilution: 1:1

    Development time @ 68 deg F (20 C): 2 minutes

    Paper Type: Portriga Rapid

    Image Tone: neutral to sepia brown

    Exposure Time: 2 x longer than normal*

    Dilution: 1:4

    Development time @ 68 deg F (20 C): 5-6 minutes

    The term "normal exposure" means the exposure required to produce the

    best possible print when developed for 1-1/2 minutes in Agfa 100.

     

    <p>

     

     

    Paper Developer Agfa 124

    for olive-brown tones

     

    <p>

     

    0,8g Metol

     

    <p>

     

    4g hydroquinone

     

    <p>

     

    15g sodium sulfite

     

    <p>

     

    9g sodium carbonate

     

    <p>

     

    8g potassium bromide

     

    <p>

     

    Exp. times and development times 2x

  7. I bought Glycin from Photographers Formulary in march, and it's still

    ok with no change in color (light golden brown). When I get potassium

    carbonate next week I will mix up most of the glycin to a highly

    concentrated Agfa 8 and fill small 30 ml bottles with it. Each bottle

    will make 500 ml working solution.

  8. Volker, I tried a catechol developer with Efke op12 lith film and the

    result was not high contrast, not medium contrast, but LOW contrast!

    I really got scared! :-O

     

    <p>

     

    I think the trick is to expose the lith film at a low speed rating (I

    used 3 Asa) and develope the film in a real compensating developer,

    and highly diluted catechol must be the best developing agent for

    this purpose.

     

    <p>

     

     

    I will try Macophot Ort25 too soon, and it will be very interesting.

    Especially when one can use a red safelight in the darkroom and cut

    the 120-film to be spooled on 127-rolls just with a sharp knife and a

    ruler. Yeah, an extremely fine grain film in my Rolleiflex 4x4!

     

    <p>

     

    Keep on experimenting folks!

  9. Yeah! I love Efke films! R14/KB14 is nowadays called R25/KB25 and R17/KB17 is R50/KB50. R21/KB21 is R100/KB100. R50 is now my standard film. R100 is great too! Very forgiving! It's hard to go wrong with this film! :-)
  10. Of course you can! Someone would suggest highly diluted Rodinal

    (1+200, 1+300), however, I think you will get the best results with a

    low contrast catechol developer like the "Modified Windisch Catechol

    Film developer". Check www.photoformulary.com for more information

    about this developer.

  11. The latest 127 news is that Macophot is planning to make their new b/w 400 "cubic" film in 127. :-)

     

    I own and use a Rolleiflex Sport 4x4 from 1938, and it's superb. It has a 2,8 Tessar instead of the 3,5 Xenar on the post-war 4x4's.

  12. Yes, that paper at the end of the roll on Efke films always irritates

    me. :-)

     

    <p>

     

    I love Efke films though, and the R50 must be my favorite film at the

    moment, and I use the R100 all the time in my 4x4 Rolleiflex Sport.

     

    <p>

     

    The Ort 25 is a little mystery, but very interesting. Haven't tried

    it yet though, but will in the future.

  13. Hello!

     

    <p>

     

    I will try this film too later this fall/winter! It seems interesting

    and should give you results looking like the photos taken in the late

    1800's.

     

    <p>

     

    Please let us know your results with this film.

     

    <p>

     

    Since it's a film for hard contrast I wonder if Rodinal 1:25 will

    work for pictoral photography. A developer with catechol could be

    better. I used a highly diluted catechol developer with lith-film and

    got negs with a long tonal range.

     

    <p>

     

    I can post the recipe for the developer I used if anyone is

    interested.

×
×
  • Create New...