jean_philippe_amans

If lenses design was easy every lenses will open at 1.0 and sharp up to atoms on all field of view... ...and photography may be boring. Some time you choose a lens for his quality, some time for his default

110F2.0 wide open (Sinar Hy-6 Emotion 75LV):

OUPS! I believe / read 110F vs 110FE as said 100F3.5 planar is different lens due to a different choice in quality goal... Opening (F2.0 or F3.5) manage some aberration (spherical...) that difficult to correct with others except using aspherical lenses. The F3.5 is a sharp good lens J.Ph.

SINAR Hy-6, Emotion 75-LV, Zeiss 110F2.0

the best way to know is to found MFT Zeiss data-sheet, or buy both, try and tell us... There are two reasons for recalculating an optic: a glass becomes unavailable (case of the 38mm biogon) or the optical quality does not meet users' expectations (case of the 80F2.8 hasselblad in its early days ...) If the recalculation of the 110mm is contemporaneous with that of the biogon, we can think of the first possibility (taking into account the stocks to be exhausted), otherwise, it is advisable to push the investigation a little further to see if there is not an opportunity to find one of the two models better suited to the subjects photographed and the desired rendering ... I have only one 110F2.0, in PQS/6008 mount, I believe it is last FE formula, it is good as you can expect for such wide open lense... (like noctilux F1.0, canon 50F0.95....not like noctilux F0.95) You want it? : you need it! You need it? : you must have! J.Ph.

Hello Dan your sentence is in wrong order:"It is because I be able to afford such fine equipment that I am poor and cry now!" In fact, it is not so expensive compared to "simple" canon / nikon DSLR The 110F2.0 can be found 1k€ in F or 1.2 to 1.5k€ in FE model. The 6008 PQ/PQS model is more rare and can be found at 2.5k€ alone but works with 6008 body you can find at 0.4k€... Comparable body to 6008 in hassy will be 205 or 203 with winder, not cheap too. So hassy or rollei solutions have near same cost for 110F2.0 use. I use(d) rollei 6008/Hy-6 with PQ/PQS "modern" lenses (Schneider or Rolzeiss) and some older zeiss lenses that not PQ/PQS (120F5.6) in Hasselbald V mount with 553/203 bodies (or lenses that not exist in Rollei SLX/6000/PQ/PQS mount like 250SA, 100F3.5) For that, 200 series are very interesting and plaisant Leitz Hektor 125F2.5 visoflex can be found low as 350€ KINOPTIK 100F2.0 Apochromat "barrel" can be found. ;) Have a look to price of Z6/Z7/R6/R7/7RIII and so, with 85F1.4 or 80~200F2.8, you can rapidly claim 5~10k€... J.Ph.

Hello YES! is it possible to have same or near same with other system? YES! I have 110F2.0 (and 80F2.0) for 6008 and you can find some example on my flickr. 3a I prefer 110 to 80 by his narrow angle that increase effect. financially speaking, Hasselblad 200 + 110 FE is same as 6008 + 110 and hasselblad 2000 + 110 F is little bit less expensive but impossible to repair body... Other lenses that can be used with Hasselblad 2000/200: Leitz Hektor 125F2.5 visoflex KINOPTIK 100F2.0 Apochromat "barrel" with M65x1 mount (RAFcamera) J.Ph.

<p>Hello<br> based on my 4560 knowledge...<br> "frame counting" is based on IR detection of rotation of rods of the film insert (look on the side an turn rods). If it's clean, IR detector in the back is dead.<br> J.Ph.</p> <p> </p>

<p>Hello<br> "gliding mirror" is a rare "option" in hasselblad camera (503CW have it, 503CX have not) and it is very good to have it...<br> 501 line was presented as cheap line. some option disapare like "T" lock. Only SAV could tell you more about internal change...<br> <br />But if you balance between RZ or Blad, choose RZ or Rollei 6008</p> <p>Thanks<br> J.Ph.</p>