Jump to content

gregory_goh

Members
  • Posts

    134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gregory_goh

  1. "However, Leica certainly did not have the right approach towards the digital M. Yes, they were completely correct about the problems, which we are now seeing on the RD-1-- vignetting, focusing, lack of picture quality compared to film, etc."

     

    I am not entirely sure the claim that the RD-1's picture quality is lacking compared to film is entirely valid.

    Also the focusing issues on the RD-1, by most accounts, are a combination of the short rangefinder base (so the equivalent Bessa film bodies have the same constraint), and mis-alignment of the rangefinger mechanism. I do take the point about the small sensor/crop factor/vignetting :-)

  2. I would like to add my own request to this one - this is the price of early adoption I guess...

    I get nervous when the menu says "calibrate needle" then, says "be careful" :-)

    Was trying like crazy to find what exactly is the metering area, and if there is a spot meter option as well, and the English menu would have come in handy

     

    Ed, I did try to install the software -on the XP machine all I got were Japanese menus and buttons - did not even know which to click!

    On the OS X, the only language maenu choice in the installation screen was for Japanese - I did not go further and perhaps I should have, just to see if the English options

     

    Greg

  3. HI Ernie,

     

    This probably will not make you feel any better, but isn't it true that most

    places in HK (and indeed in Asia) do not deal in trade-ins or returns in the

    American sense? I am not surprised that Wing Shing did not want to take the

    camera back, but I believe the market practice is that once something is sold it

    is deemed used, and if the shop in question does not deal in used gear, they

    will not of course take it back. This may not apply if the equipment itself was

    actually faulty, of course - but I would not have thought that after you used it

    and found the noise unacceptable (to you), that they would agree it was faulty

    in that sense

  4. I myself am holding back on purchase, with the choice between the A2 and the LC-1. 28-200 is very tempting in a walkaround camera with image stabilization - which works by the way - you can see it on the LCD instantly when you turn it on.

    Interesting statement in the LC-1 review; the reviewer stated early on that the LC-1 was still not as good as a Canon 300D, while being more expensive.

    On the other hand the A2 could turn out to be in the same class as the Sony 828, which according to MR, is similar in quality to a 10D/300D with an L class zoom

    Then again there is the digital M and the Epson/Cosina!

    Interesting times :-)

  5. I think that most of the camera shops have varying prices depending on the shipment against which they are quoting - if the Yen goes up then so do prices - I know it can be upsetting but that is the way they set their pricing, so if your inquiry and payment were very far apart in terms of timing that could explain the difference.
  6. Hi Thanks for the response

     

    Not unhappy with the Metz at all but, I only currently use it with my Leica. I seem to have heard somewhere that there may be compatibility issues in low light situations, which the TLA 360 may avoid since it is a Contax flash.

    My situaition is that I need a flash for the Contax 645, but in order to use the Metz I will have to buy an adaptor, and the price is not that far away in Hong Kong from the cost of a new TLA 360!

×
×
  • Create New...